For Tackattack

[colubridae]

Somehow I don’t think I’m getting my point across.

I’ll try again.

1 One of the accusations thrown against Christianity (in particular) is the claim of an omnipotent god. Such an omnipotent god is a paradox. I am well aware of this paradox. As are Christians.
I am not claiming that it doesn’t exist.

2 ‘Thinking’ Christians have developed blathering circumlocutions in order to avoid this paradox, whilst still claiming an omnipotent god. I do claim that these attempts are pure hogwash.

3 I have physical evidence (actually, evidence that is available to more or less everyone) which will (to my intense chagrin) support Christians in circumventing the problem of their omnipotent god.

but when you use a logical fallacy to get your point across you are doing the same thing most of us complain about fundamentalists

I am not ‘using’ that argument at all. My evidence undermines the accusation of paradox. A paradox which despite much bluster they cannot avoid, any more than they can avoid the epicurean dilemma despite equal avalanches of bluster.

In an extremely annoying way my honesty is ‘forcing’ me to be neutral, and point out evidence which supports the Christian view.

I’m not sure that makes sense. I hope so.