Stunning, isn't it, that jason56 (or whatever that guy's name is) completely denies that he believes in god after stating that we deny god's role in evolution.
And, of course, we are expected to believe that his profile signature, which procliams a religion of some kind (which one is non-specified) is a statment intended to test our reactions to it.
A test which, by the way, he asserts we failed after he went on our forum and called us short-sighted for practicing freedom of speech.
This sounds a bit too convenient. My assertion: he's highly religious, noticed that there is indeed a trend here that theists have their beliefs refuted, and pretended to be an atheist so he could guilt us into giving "one of our own" a different response than we would give a theist.
If he had recieved this different response, he would have thrown this actual test in our faces as proof of bias. But he didn't, because we're logical and respond to pathetic dogma the same way, no matter who it comes from.
Plus, he's an idiot who did a very poor job of hiding his religion. Perhaps he thought it would be a betrayal of some kind to whoever his god is if he changed his prof. sig. to Atheist.
Or maybe he just has no fucking idea what an atheist actually is (a person who has a complete and utter disbelief in god- not hatred or mistrust- but disbelief), and he actually believes that he is an atheist.
Alternatively, it was a test as he said. In that case, he doesn't understand that we're hostile to theists because most of them on this forum, rather than only state a belief, attempt to undermine the factual information we present. (Evolution, etc.)
And, of course, we are expected to believe that his profile signature, which procliams a religion of some kind (which one is non-specified) is a statment intended to test our reactions to it.
A test which, by the way, he asserts we failed after he went on our forum and called us short-sighted for practicing freedom of speech.
This sounds a bit too convenient. My assertion: he's highly religious, noticed that there is indeed a trend here that theists have their beliefs refuted, and pretended to be an atheist so he could guilt us into giving "one of our own" a different response than we would give a theist.
If he had recieved this different response, he would have thrown this actual test in our faces as proof of bias. But he didn't, because we're logical and respond to pathetic dogma the same way, no matter who it comes from.
Plus, he's an idiot who did a very poor job of hiding his religion. Perhaps he thought it would be a betrayal of some kind to whoever his god is if he changed his prof. sig. to Atheist.
Or maybe he just has no fucking idea what an atheist actually is (a person who has a complete and utter disbelief in god- not hatred or mistrust- but disbelief), and he actually believes that he is an atheist.
Alternatively, it was a test as he said. In that case, he doesn't understand that we're hostile to theists because most of them on this forum, rather than only state a belief, attempt to undermine the factual information we present. (Evolution, etc.)
What falls away is always, and is near.
Also, I am not pretending to be female, this profile picture is my wonderful girlfriend. XD
