Intelligent design science?

[KichigaiNeko]

---

I have some AWESOME friends

[Phil]

I personally think that would be outright silly and not science, because there is no chance of it even assembling by natural means, for any calculations to be made in reality.

And those calculations would be? According to statistical mechanics your friend is an idiot.

[KichigaiNeko]

Interesting find

---

And FTW !!!!


Posted elsewhere for your convenience

[Justtristo]

Unitelligent Design is more apt term in my opinion instead of "Intelligent Design".

[Phil]

The only real question of design in science (cosmology) is why the observable universe began in a low entropy state when a high entropy state is much more likely (by much I mean much100) and there have been answers proposed that are more then adequate explanations by both Aguirre and Gratton and Carroll and Chen.

Both papers show the universe can be natural with no design.

My question would be why is it that some people try to use science to provide evidence for their idiotic fables and personal beliefs when it is clear they know nothing of science past what they might have retained from high school?

[Faith No More]

I am an enlightened being...

If you have to keep telling people this, you are not enlightened. If you were truly enlightened, you would be able to demonstrate that with your ideas and words, yet nothing you have ever said would indicate such.

[Bgood]

AUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!