Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 20, 2024, 12:05 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Intelligent' design?
#11
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 8:19 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Unintelligent design, requiring food in the first place, ensuring that some portion of us will starve every day. To compound matters, leaving us to engineer our food after saddling us with the requirement. God couldn't handle an ear of fucking corn? Worthless.

Requiring food has nothing to do with design. All life has metabolism and requires an energy source otherwise they would quickly "melt" into a state of equilibrium.
Reply
#12
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 8:44 pm)Phil Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 8:19 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Unintelligent design, requiring food in the first place, ensuring that some portion of us will starve every day. To compound matters, leaving us to engineer our food after saddling us with the requirement. God couldn't handle an ear of fucking corn? Worthless.

Requiring food has nothing to do with design. All life has metabolism and requires an energy source otherwise they would quickly "melt" into a state of equilibrium.

Not if we ran on pure magicness
Reply
#13
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
We're talking about god here Phil, fucker can do whatever he likes, including allowing us to exist in the middle of a pulsar on nothing but "psychic energy". Metabolism, energy and equilibrium don't sound like design features at all, sounds more like something cobbled together by a less than sentient process working only with what it had unable to imagine or manufacture a less troublesome alternative. Embrace the idiocy, its the best defense against idiocy.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#14
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
FYI - ID theory does not offer an explanation about the designer, nor the design itself. It just suggests that there is a designer based on the observation of the natural realm.
Reply
#15
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Yet even in this, if fails completely. Mostly because of their inability to offer explanations about any design or designer. Ever thought of that?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#16
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 9:43 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Yet even in this, if fails completely. Mostly because of their inability to offer explanations about any design or designer. Ever thought of that?

Because, ID theory is not capable of doing such, just as evolutionary THEORY cannot explain why we are here in the first place. ID theory can only point to the obviousness that something has been designed, rather than naturally formed.
Reply
#17
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
ID theory isn't capable of doing anything, because there is no such thing. It's just a running joke of a list of complaints (each roundly rejected as not- science, bad -science, and flat out ignorance). Whether or not the explanations offered by EbNS (or any other means) are satisfying to you has nothing to do with whether or not they offer explanations. If ID were obvious, you wouldn't have to argue for it at all, it would be science. It is not. You, my friend, were naturally formed. Along with everything else around you. All evidence points to this, no evidence points to any other explanation. Surprise surprise, no other explanation is required.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#18
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 9:46 pm)black36 Wrote: Because, ID theory is not capable of doing such, just as evolutionary THEORY cannot explain why we are here in the first place. ID theory can only point to the obviousness that something has been designed, rather than naturally formed.

But ID isn't a theory. Its bullshit.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theory
Reply
#19
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 9:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: ID theory isn't capable of doing anything, because there is no such thing. It's just a running joke of a list of complaints (each roundly rejected as not- science, bad -science, and flat out ignorance). Whether or not the explanations offered by EbNS (or any other means) are satisfying to you has nothing to do with whether or not they offer explanations. If ID were obvious, you wouldn't have to argue for it at all, it would be science. It is not.

All ID theory does is suggest a possible explanation for the obvious purpose present in a given scenario.
Reply
#20
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Once again not a theory...
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 1532 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 5088 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: GUBU
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 12806 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4278 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 44792 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 8492 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 5797 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2193 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Disbelief in an intelligent creator = far fetched? Foxaèr 39 7833 January 12, 2015 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Nope
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 6392 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)