Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Cygnus Loop
March 24, 2012 at 7:38 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2012 at 7:46 am by orogenicman.)
Just to be clear, the Cygus loop (also known as the veil nebula) is a supernova remnant, while Barnard's loop is a broad galactic region of ionized gas and dust.
Here is an image of the cygnus loop using a partial "Hubble pallet", which in this case consists of filters for hydrogen alpha emission (green in this instance), and triply ionized oxygen (blue).
Here is my image of the eastern veil Nebula:
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Cygnus Loop
March 24, 2012 at 9:25 pm
Glad you liked it. I hope to get a better version of that by the end of the year. Here is a Hubble color-mapped image of the Rosette nebula done by someone else (Not sure who):
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero