Evolution in action

[Cinjin]

Is it time to bring this one back out again?

[Jackalope]

While we're at it, how about we track down Statler and dredge up the old "Dinosaurs never existed" thread?

[zebo-the-fat]

All they are doing is taking God's fully developed created creatures, who are influenced by the fall of Adam then adding some ingredient to see what changes will take place then claiming 'evolutiondidit'.

And the "evidence" for god and the influence of Adam is what?
(by evidence I mean something testable and falsifiable, not just I read it in a bronze age book")

[Minimalist]

Hypothesize means that an assumption is made in the absence of conclusive proof. As you know, evolution is a theory.

oops!

The stupid is strong with this one, Jack.

[Thor]

The problem evolutionists have to overcome to prove their theory correct is that they have to stop taking fully developed species, with fully developed genes then introducing outside influences while observing the reaction.

The problem creationists have to overcome is to stop insisting that unsubstantiated bullshit is true.

to prove the supposed evolutionary theory true an evolutionist has to start from square one and show the process in actual action from the one celled original species, including original enviornmental conditions, to each historical change evolutionists claim took place.

Uh...... no. This is like saying that to prove the theory of plate tectonics we need to have observed the continents drifting for the past hundred million years from their original positions to where they are now.

Moving a bird from one continent to another does not prove evolution

And who said it did?

but the ability of God's created creatures to adapt to new enviornments.

Hmmm.... sounds like you're talking about evolution here. You just want to include a deity in the equation.

Evolutionists have yet to produce one actual scientific experiment that documents the historical claimed evolutionary changes.

You mean that speciation has never been observed? Because it has.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

All they are doing is taking God's fully developed created creatures,

There's that "God" again. This is science, not mythology.

who are influenced by the fall of Adam

Unsubstantiated bullshit.

then adding some ingredient to see what changes will take place then claiming 'evolutiondidit'.

Which makes a whole lot more sense than "Goddidit!"

Evolutionists are stealing from God,

You can't steal from someone that doesn't exist.

taking the credit for His work and brainwashing the unsuspecting.

I'm guessing the irony of a Babble thumper accusing others of "brainwashing the unsuspecting" is lost on you. Why do you think the church wants to get its hands on kids as soon as possible? (Well, other than so they can molest them). It's so they can fill their heads with crap while they're impressionable.

They are not producing one piece of evidence for evolution.

What a pantload! Please educate yourself on this topic before opening your mouth again. I'm sure your local community college has excellent course offerings.

The problem with that picture is that there is no evidence showing those skulls turning into a different species. There is no evidence showing the supposed evolutionary process at work, all you have is a picture of a bunch of skulls and then declaring it is proof for evolution.

I love it when dipwads like you claim there is no evidence for evolution. Then, when you're shown evidence, you declare that it's not evidence!

You have no evidence showing the transformation,

That picture is pretty to clear evidence to someone whose brain hasn't been contaminated by religious bullshit.

just conjecture and faith.

No, we have evidence on our side. YOU are the one who has nothing but conjecture and faith.

[Phil]

. This is like saying that to prove the theory of plate tectonics we need to have observed the continents drifting for the past hundred million years from their original positions to where they are now.

You know we can see the drift through GPS data and it is between 5-10 cm per year. Taking the high YEC date for the Earth's age of 10000 years would mean Europe (the west coast of Portugal) and the east coast of the USA (say Atlantic City) means they would be separated by 50000 - 100000 cm which translates to .5 - 1 km (.31 - .62 miles), which means I can stand on the beach in New Jersey and drool at the topless babe in Portugal. Also a European vacation would not require an expensive flight since even fat old me could swim 2/3 of a mile.

[Jackalope]

You know we can see the drift through GPS data and it is between 5-10 cm per year. Taking the high YEC date for the Earth's age of 10000 years would mean Europe (the west coast of Portugal) and the east coast of the USA (say Atlantic City) means they would be separated by 50000 - 100000 cm which translates to .5 - 1 km (.31 - .62 miles), which means I can stand on the beach in New Jersey and drool at the topless babe in Portugal. Also a European vacation would not require an expensive flight since even fat old me could swim 2/3 of a mile.

You can't argue with that. You did the math and everything.

[DeeTee]

Is it time to bring this one back out again?

While we're at it, how about we track down Statler and dredge up the old "Dinosaurs never existed" thread?

Avoidance. You can't do it can you? You need to take the easy way out and rely on conjecture and faith that evolution is true and actually exists.

Your process is as invisible as you all claim God is, where is your evidence that it actually exists? Why would you trade one 'invisible' being for another?

No, we have evidence on our side.

No. You haven't produced one shred of it in your post nor has any evolutionist done so. Remember evolutionists are working with already fully developed genetic material and using already fully developed genetic material to do their experiments.

That is cheating and taking credit for someone else's work, it is not showing that the supposed process actually exists and does what evolutionists claim.

please start with the one celled creature, with original conditions, and without outside intelligent beings help and show your theory and process is correct and actually exists.

To do otherwise means it does not and you are merely looking for anything to fill the void you created when you tossed God and the truth out the window when you rejected them.

Remember the claim is that the supposed process did all of this without help and randomly. Scientific involvement taints whatever experiment you have done or are doing and does not prove your theory correct.

This is like saying that to prove the theory of plate tectonics we need to have observed the continents drifting for the past hundred million years from their original positions to where they are now.

Yes you do because theory and conjecture are not fact and are not observation. You have no way of verifying one thing evolutionists have claimed and all you are doing is the very thing you reject when God says it: 'Take my word for it and use faith.' (Something the Mormons do quite well)

God says 'Here is what I have done, Here is a record for you so you know what i did and use faith for faith pleases me.'

You reject that from God YET use it for your own theory. Won't fly. Pony up the real evidence, prove your case or shut up about evolution forever. {and you cannot start with the end result, bring the real evidence starting from square one}

[Anomalocaris]

What a presumptious little piece of christian shit you are. Tell you what, I'll shove a bible up your ass until it comes out of your mouth, and then you can start with before Genesis, with original condition, and prove your genesis to be correct.

[Minimalist]

Arch....who prefers to go by the name of DT here...is firmly ensconced in the idea that if he never opens his eyes he will never have to deal with the museums full of evidence for Evolution.

He then labors on under the misapprehension that his continued failure to face reality makes his fairy takes true by default.

I guess he isn't so different from the rest of the really nutty Jesus freaks on that score.