I found some pretty interesting site regaurding this--the Rational Response Squad, for one--and some tiny little websites about different autheors and such--very informative
But, I did find one that provided some in formation--alot, really--about skeptics and scientists taking the wrong look at things.
The website is here:
http://www.freeinquiry.com/skeptic/resou...ptical.htm
(It's long, has a whooole bunch, but I only read the articles that struck my interest xD)
Fantastic. At first, i thought it was going through a list of pro-arguments from a skeptical perspective, then you read a bit more, and it goes on to say that skeptics are cynical, close-minded, and not open to new "evidence" for psychics and clairvoyants and all that.
This guy presents some pretty interesting arguments...read a few here and there, and tell me what you think.
But, I did find one that provided some in formation--alot, really--about skeptics and scientists taking the wrong look at things.
The website is here:
http://www.freeinquiry.com/skeptic/resou...ptical.htm
(It's long, has a whooole bunch, but I only read the articles that struck my interest xD)
Fantastic. At first, i thought it was going through a list of pro-arguments from a skeptical perspective, then you read a bit more, and it goes on to say that skeptics are cynical, close-minded, and not open to new "evidence" for psychics and clairvoyants and all that.
This guy presents some pretty interesting arguments...read a few here and there, and tell me what you think.