Flashy site for logical fallacies.

[Tiberius]

Found a flashy (though no Adobe Flash required) website that documents a number of logical fallacies in an easy-to-understand format.

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com

[5thHorseman]

I like the anecdotal one. I shall use that when debating nutrition on other forums. People use anecdotal in the face of science all the time in nutrition. Known as 'broscience'

[Napoléon]

Straight in my favourites Tibby

[Faith No More]

Someone already beat you to it, Tibs.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-14162.ht...+fallacies

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

A similar site is http://logicallyfallacious.com/index.php...-fallacies though one complaint I got from a theist was that it was "bigoted" since many of the examples are typical Christian apologetic arguments. But several of examples are typical atheist arguments in fact, and most of the examples are just generic examples.

And there's of course http://www.fallacyfiles.org

[Cyberman]

Another one for my favourites folder as well, and so nicely put together. I'd been aware of fallacyfiles, since it's probably the most famous anyway. As for LogicallyFallacious, it's scary to see how many of these things there really are.

I suppose the following might sort of come under the heading of logical fallacies, in a rather loose definition of the term, but somehow it feels appropriate to add it to the list:

http://www.weirdcrap.com/recreational/cliche.html

It's "Psycho Dave's" list of common Christian Clichés and is also quite well-known. Another useful list.

[Tiberius]

Someone already beat you to it, Tibs.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-14162.ht...+fallacies

Nobody ever "beats" me to anything. I merely permit them to get there first.

[Phish]

Pretty pretty shiny shiny!

[Angrboda]

What confuses me somewhat, is how much emphasis many skeptical people put on understanding fallacies, yet are often woefully ignorant of the many forms of cognitive bias. Both have comparable power in leading a rational person to invalid conclusions, yet cognitive bias is often ignored altogether. And in some ways, errors resulting from not appreciating cognitive bias are worse, as many operate at the unconscious level, where they are undetectable by the individual. You can reasonably determine if an argument is sound and valid, as the proof is in front of you. Not so with cognitive error.

[Rayaan]

I like the fallacy fallacy.

If someone uses the fallacy fallacy to argue that you are necessarily wrong, then that could be called the fallacy fallacy fallacy.
You can keep on adding an endless amount of, you know, "fallacy fallacy fallacy fallacy ..." fallacy.