OMG NAKED KID IT'S CHILD PORNO OMFG LIKE NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN KIDS NAKED BEFORE WTF JENOENF{WDMCL:F DJKSND:LMA<
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 3, 2024, 1:06 pm
Thread Rating:
|
ಠ_ಠ
|
 RE: ಠ_ಠ
October 3, 2012 at 7:56 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2012 at 8:00 am by Tempus.)
I didn't even know children had genitals.
Edit: now I've read the article. That's really... stupid. 
Naked children have genitals what the fuck man! That's so not true!
I don't even want to know where children come from now...
I assume, through other cases throughout history;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minamata_disease that a acknowligement of what has happend, only comes after the results of years of polution show their ugly face.  (October 2, 2012 at 8:00 pm)Waratah Wrote: I think it was pretty stupid using a picture of a naked child taking a bath in dirty water. Whether it is pornographic or not is beside the point. When you use an image like that, you give ammunition to opponents to at least suggest the possibility of pedophilia and also definitely lose the evidence.I agree. I don't think it's appropriate to use pictures of naked children in any kind of advertisement.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg) Quote: JohnDG... Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change. 
No - you show it because people need to understand what they're doing to their future. It has nothing to do with child porn, it isn't a staged gimmick - it's the fucking truth.
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png) 
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione
Its a nice diversion maneuvre, to put the focus into something they have nothing to answer for.
 RE: ಠ_ಠ
October 3, 2012 at 9:43 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2012 at 9:44 am by Tea Earl Grey Hot.)
When did everyone become so puritanical about what constitutes cp? The sort of absurd reactions you see today to a photo like this seem like only a recent phenomena.
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence." -- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103). RE: ಠ_ಠ
October 3, 2012 at 9:52 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2012 at 9:53 am by Something completely different.)
(October 3, 2012 at 9:12 am)A Theist Wrote: I agree. I don't think it's appropriate to use pictures of naked children in any kind of advertisement. ![[Image: holocaust_children.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.akcjadobrapolskaszkola.com%2Fart%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fholocaust_children.jpg) would you consider this to be child porn? or advertisment? and how do you bring the therm "advertisment" into this? surely trying to raise the awareness of the general public on a issue could be called "advertisment" if one is trying to sell a product. but in the case of raising awareness on a issue wich is a crime or other injustifiable action the term "advertisment" makes you sound like some coldhearted schwarzenegger machine. or did you use this term on purpose to show your disregard towards that families claims? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
