Evolution: Full of Fiction

[popeyespappy]

[Creed of Heresy]

That is not evolution

The theory you are searching for is abiogenesis, the theory of evolution explains how life got so diverse once life arose on earth. Clearly, you don't even know what you are talking about.

Response: Dummy. The theory behind the origin of life is called the theory of evolution. Clearly, you can't refute the obvious fact that non-life can't create life, which propmpted your dumb rebuttal. The laugh is on you.

Fine I'll feed the troll too since I guess nobody else wants not to.

Response: NO U.

The theory being the origin of life IS the theory of abiogenesis you fucking incestuous child-raping towel-head. You're either ignorant to the point of insanity or you're a troll. If it's the former, then I eagerly await the news of your martyr-bomb going off prematurely and taking all your curry-smelling hairy asshole friends with you. And if the latter you're the most successful troll in history. Either way I eagerly await the news of your removal from existence.

[The Grand Nudger]

Meh, my great grandparents were human beings, regardless of what yours may have been. That has very little to do with whether or not evolution is an observed fact- it is, or whether or not it is the theory of the origin of life on this planet - it isn't.

[Creed of Heresy]

Response: Nope. What it is is that you realize that the foolish preaching of trying to convince us that science proves that we descended from ape-like ancetors will only be accepted by mental cases. If you want to believe that your great grand parents use to swing from trees throwing their feces at each other, then that's your business. Just keep the idiocy to yourself.

Response: Bitch I'd love to see you TRY to make me keep ANYTHING to myself. Faith in Allah won't keep a 7.62mm bullet from splattering your brains all over the pavement if you do, I promise you. The science of ballistics trumps the faith in Allah every day.

[Brian37]

Scientific evidence is based on tests and observation, yet no one has ever observed a species evolving into another species. So this would demonstrate that evolution is not supported by science.

Yet those in support of evolution claim that it has been observed. If asked to prove it, they can neither bring forth any video footage of a species evolving into another species, or they rely on scientifc claims that it has been observed, but cannot provide proof that the authors are speaking truthfuly.

And when we consider the fact that scientists have falsified evidence and lied about evolution (such as piltdown man, javaman, and ota benga), this makes evolution even more unreliable.

So the evidence should be obviously clear that perhaps the biggest hoax and lie of all-time is evolution.

Do you look the same as when your sperm met your egg? No, you had slow changes over a long period of time. Evolution is the same. A chimp does not give birth to a human, but that is not what evolution is claiming. That is a stupid fallacy someone sold you.

DNA = Adenine, Guanine, Thymine and Cytosine, proves that WE shared common ancestors as other primates. You stupidly think that biological evolution is suggesting a frog produced a horse.

Your post shows you have no damned clue what evolution is or how it works.

Small changes over long periods of time. Why do people call tigers and lions the "big cats" and use "cats" as in "domestic house cats" if they were not related? BECAUSE THEY SHARE COMMON ANCESTORS.

Just like all dogs stem from wolves, COMMON ANCESTORS.

Evolution is also why scientists have to come up with new flu vaccines every year, because the virus adapts and changes.

You seriously need to stop listening to the people who sold you the crap you argued. Evolution is as much a fact as gravity.

[Forsaken]

Response: Ban this motherfucker.

[TaraJo]

Here ya' go. Another video of evolution being observed, this time from a palentological perspective. It's done in a somewhat 'dumbed down' way so that even simpletons like OP can get it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROwKq3kxPEA

That being said, I still fully expect him to plug up his ears, scream "Lalalalala! I can't hear you! Lalalalala!" and then claim that there's no proof because he hasn't seen it.

[Creed of Heresy]

Tara: Don't you mean "ALLAHALLAHALLAHALLAH I CAN'T HEAR YOU ALLAHALLAHALLAH!"?

[FallentoReason]

LIFE FROM NON-LIFE

RNA is the stuff that will make your god find the next hiding spot.

DNA is essential to almost all life on Earth, yet most biologists think that life began with RNA. Just like DNA, it stores genetic information. What's more, RNA can fold into complex shapes that can clamp onto other molecules and speed up chemical reactions, just like a protein, and it is structurally simpler than DNA, so might be easier to make.

It has the potential to do this:

In a neat twist, Holliger's team also showed that tC19Z can make copies of another RNA enzyme, which then worked correctly. That suggests that, once the first self-replicating RNA had appeared, it would have been able to surround itself with additional molecular equipment, kick-starting the evolution of more complex life.

And guess what...

After decades of trying, in 2009 researchers finally managed to generate RNA using chemicals that probably existed on the early Earth. Matthew Powner, now at University College London, and his colleagues synthesised two of the four nucleotides that make up RNA. Their achievement suggested that RNA may have formed spontaneously - powerful support for the idea that life began in an "RNA world".

Give it time and your arguments here will be effectively refuted by science -- AGAIN.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shorts...rna-e.html

http://www.newscientist.com/mobile/artic...tself.html

[median]

That is not evolution

The theory you are searching for is abiogenesis, the theory of evolution explains how life got so diverse once life arose on earth. Clearly, you don't even know what you are talking about.

Response: Dummy. The theory behind the origin of life is called the theory of evolution. Clearly, you can't refute the obvious fact that non-life can't create life, which propmpted your dumb rebuttal. The laugh is on you.

You haven't demonstrated any qualifications by which to justify judgement on what is possible or impossible in our reality. Thus, your claims (just like those superstitious religionists that came before you) are empty.

The honest position is to admit (and I do mean to use that word - ADMIT) that you simply don't know what's possible or not. You are IGNORANT and GULLIBLE.

---

Nah. Some of us hope that if we post enough pictures of his pedophile prophet fucking pigs before he eats them the troll’s blood pressure will go up enough to cause a hemorrhagic stroke and it won’t be able to type…

Response: Nope. What it is is that you realize that the foolish preaching of trying to convince us that science proves that we descended from ape-like ancetors will only be accepted by mental cases. If you want to believe that your great grand parents use to swing from trees throwing their feces at each other, then that's your business. Just keep the idiocy to yourself.

The idiocy is all yours, since you haven't taken any biological courses in anthropology, paleontology, genetics, bio-chemistry, or anything else. You're just talking out of your ass and making shit up, out of your own ignorance of the entire subject.

Come back when you know a little something about the subjects you are trying to fight. [It's called SCHOOL...]

---

Response: Yet the problem you have is that there is no scientific evidence for evolution, because evolution is FALSE. So the idiotic claim of "if ALL the scientific evidence for evolution (and it is overwhelming) were taken away," makes you sound like a braindead imbecile.

And when an atheist brings up religion on the topic of evolution, it's clearly an attempt to change from the actual topic, because they know that evolution is ful of crap. So if you want to make an attempt and sound intelligent, then stop doing acts that show stupidity, including nonsense like evolution is scientific proven.

HA! You can start by demonstrating that you even know what the theory of evolution actually states, b/c your words here show (quite clearly) that you don't know WTF you're talking about. "Proven false"?? You must be talking about a different theory (i.e. - the one you made up in your head). Do you know what that's called?

STRAW-MAN FALLACY

You are a fucking dumb ass - mixing terms, making shit up, and generally talking out of your ass because you are uneducated (and proud). WOW. Get real.

p.s. - Make sure you look into the mirror when you say "braindead imbicile" next time. LMAO.