Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 8:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RevOxley inro thread
#11
RE: RevOxley inro thread
Quite an interesting read! I like it.

Amp
Reply
#12
RE: RevOxley inro thread
Seems you are very fresh out of the camp Rev. I know it took me years to get over my experience properly. Perhaps 15 years until it really had no influence over me.

In my experience there were no difficulties with the supposed contradictions in the bible. In my understanding what you call something can be interpreted two ways. A lot of what is easily ascribed to God could equally be ascribed to 'not God' or 'chance'. The logic was sound but the interpretation could be loaded.

And then for me belief relies on faith. Belief HAS to be a leap of logic. There is necessarily no demonstrable proof of anything. Of course it is all necessarily personal in nature. I suppose I convinced myself to reject the personal evidence, which is an entirely logical thing to do, given the constricts of the belief.

I think you did an excellent job with that. For what it's worth. You seem to be a pretty centred person to me. Good luck with it all Wink
Reply
#13
RE: RevOxley inro thread
(August 17, 2009 at 5:28 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Hey Rev, I guess we don't need to be introduced Big Grin

Didn't know you had a wife though. Is she an atheist too?


Hey there H8tr

No, the wife is not an atheist...she is in limbo I guess. Agnostic or Agnostic Atheist might be the most appropriate term...but she isn't really into defining things. I kind of drug her into the faith (I led her to Jesus when we were still in middle school...hehe) and when I started falling away we didn't even talk about it...she just up and told me one day that she didn't buy the Jesus bullshit anymore...and I was relieved to say the least.
(August 17, 2009 at 7:42 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Seems you are very fresh out of the camp Rev. I know it took me years to get over my experience properly. Perhaps 15 years until it really had no influence over me.

In my experience there were no difficulties with the supposed contradictions in the bible. In my understanding what you call something can be interpreted two ways. A lot of what is easily ascribed to God could equally be ascribed to 'not God' or 'chance'. The logic was sound but the interpretation could be loaded.

And then for me belief relies on faith. Belief HAS to be a leap of logic. There is necessarily no demonstrable proof of anything. Of course it is all necessarily personal in nature. I suppose I convinced myself to reject the personal evidence, which is an entirely logical thing to do, given the constricts of the belief.

I think you did an excellent job with that. For what it's worth. You seem to be a pretty centred person to me. Good luck with it all Wink


Thanks very much...I constantly struggle for "centeredess" so it's nice to hear that
Reply
#14
RE: RevOxley inro thread
Stay away from the center! Azagthoth will re-absorb you!

I just have to say I really enjoyed your extimony. I often think that de-conversion should be a goal of atheism but worry that we would turn right into the kind of, agenda having, bastards that some religious people become.

To proselytize or not to proselytize, should I even ask the question?

Rhizo
Reply
#15
RE: RevOxley inro thread
Welcome to the forums Rev Big Grin

EvF
Reply
#16
RE: RevOxley inro thread
(August 17, 2009 at 8:07 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: To proselytize or not to proselytize, should I even ask the question?

LMAO Big Grin

You defend your world view: Prostelization happens. The seed is sown. None of us can help it.
Reply
#17
RE: RevOxley inro thread
(August 17, 2009 at 8:07 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: To proselytize or not to proselytize, should I even ask the question?

Rhizo


posted an entry on my examiner page recently on that very same subject...got to #2 in the Atheism subreddit.

lots of people loved it, lots of people hated it.
Reply
#18
RE: RevOxley inro thread
A warm welcome to you, rev! Big Grin
The dark side awaits YOU...AngryAtheism
"Only the dead have seen the end of war..." - Plato
“Those who wish to base their morality literally on the Bible have either not read it or not understood it...” - Richard Dawkins
Reply
#19
RE: RevOxley inro thread
(August 18, 2009 at 3:44 am)fr0d0 Wrote:
(August 17, 2009 at 8:07 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: To proselytize or not to proselytize, should I even ask the question?

LMAO Big Grin

You defend your world view: Prostelization happens. The seed is sown. None of us can help it.

Yes if you defend your worldview; I don't. For example, I enjoy smoking marijuana, but I do not proselytize. I see no reason to try to get other people to smoke weed. There is a subtle, but important, difference between telling people about something you believe and proselytizing. I am still on the fence about proselytizing for atheism. People are so happy with their god, I am conflicted about trying to pry that away from them. It would be beneficial for people to let go of specious reasoning and view the world without the reframe job that religion seems to cause.

@RevOxley - I'll have to check out your page, thanks.

Rhizo
Reply
#20
RE: RevOxley inro thread
You don't defend your worldview on here Rhiz?? You don't correct what appears to be error to you?

Yeah I'm against forcing a point of view onto anyone. I don't see proselytizing as that.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)