Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 11:09 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Denial of freedom
#21
RE: Denial of freedom
(May 29, 2013 at 11:16 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(May 28, 2013 at 10:19 pm)dazzn Wrote: if i want standard knowledge, who are you to deny me? hmm?

Now, who determines who can do or have what in life, hmm? Is there this mystic force? I think the entire concept of mysticism is a crock of bullshit. I think people, including you, are scared of me getting standard knowledge.

Who is preventing you from obtaining 'standard knowledge' (whatever you mean by that)? How are they preventing you from obtaining it?

Apparently by telling him he can't assault people who's temporal-spatial position is inconvenient to him.
Reply
#22
RE: Denial of freedom
Well dazzn...

I googled the term "normal knowlege" and the result was a link to "mentalhealthforum" at which some asshat had opened a thread and agressively insisted that others were preventing him from gaining "normal knowlege". Whilest other members were confused and later amused over that term.

http://www.mentalhealthforum.net/forum/thread20447.html

The other link lead me to a student forum in which "someone else" insisted that someone was preventing him from gaining "normal knowlege". But what makes this forum so special, is that the users emidiatly started to not take you serious. Probably because through the first 3 post you were talking with yourself.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthre...?t=1544397

The next link was to a releationship forum, in which one can read pritty much the same nonsence.

http://www.relationship-forums.com/showt...29&t=29325

Same shit again on a philosophy forum:

http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic...5&t=180197

Again on a Love forum:

http://www.loveforum.net/threads/53686-w...-knowledge

a city forum:

http://www.city-data.com/forum/religion-...ledge.html

Urban75 forum:

http://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/i-...ge.284010/

ItnjForum:

http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?s=2e...7&t=104124






well...........

You really are one very sad individual.



Anyway, this means you are likely to get banned and that someone else at some other forum will list this forum as an example of how a certain user demanding "normal knowlege" is an asshat.
Reply
#23
RE: Denial of freedom
[Image: conspiracy-keanu.jpg]
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
#24
RE: Denial of freedom
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Ma...cheWannabe
Reply
#25
RE: Denial of freedom
Dazzn,

I feel sorry for you. You use the internet to ask why you can't have normal knowledge instead of using it to acquire that which is freely available to you. Now understanding your dilemma, I wish to help.

Meet me at 96, Euston Road, London, at a time of your choosing. I will then upload to you the entire collection one volume at a time. If you are pressed for time bring the largest container of petroleum jelly you can find; increases upload speed.
Reply
#26
RE: Denial of freedom
(May 29, 2013 at 12:31 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Well dazzn...

I googled the term "normal knowlege" and the result was a link to "mentalhealthforum" at which some asshat had opened a thread and agressively insisted that others were preventing him from gaining "normal knowlege". Whilest other members were confused and later amused over that term.

http://www.mentalhealthforum.net/forum/thread20447.html

The other link lead me to a student forum in which "someone else" insisted that someone was preventing him from gaining "normal knowlege". But what makes this forum so special, is that the users emidiatly started to not take you serious. Probably because through the first 3 post you were talking with yourself.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthre...?t=1544397

The next link was to a releationship forum, in which one can read pritty much the same nonsence.

http://www.relationship-forums.com/showt...29&t=29325

Same shit again on a philosophy forum:

http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic...5&t=180197

Again on a Love forum:

http://www.loveforum.net/threads/53686-w...-knowledge

a city forum:

http://www.city-data.com/forum/religion-...ledge.html

Urban75 forum:

http://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/i-...ge.284010/

ItnjForum:

http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?s=2e...7&t=104124






well...........

You really are one very sad individual.



Anyway, this means you are likely to get banned and that someone else at some other forum will list this forum as an example of how a certain user demanding "normal knowlege" is an asshat.

you choose to hoard, well I don't accept your right to do as such.

(May 29, 2013 at 12:04 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(May 29, 2013 at 11:16 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Who is preventing you from obtaining 'standard knowledge' (whatever you mean by that)? How are they preventing you from obtaining it?

Apparently by telling him he can't assault people who's temporal-spatial position is inconvenient to him.

It depends. society says that "morals" are transient.
Reply
#27
RE: Denial of freedom
(May 29, 2013 at 1:44 pm)dazzn Wrote: you choose to hoard, well I don't accept your right to do as such.


well, what you gonna do about it?!
Reply
#28
RE: Denial of freedom
(May 29, 2013 at 1:44 pm)dazzn Wrote: It depends. society says that "morals" are transient.

When did society get a voice.

Societies morals do move with the times.

Most societies no longer think that slavery is acceptable, rape is now an acknowledged thing within marriage and homosexuality is not illegal etc etc.

This I think shows that what is deemed moral can change over time in a secular society BUT only by the consent of society.

In this sense secular societies are much better than the intransigent theistic alternative.

Just because morals aren't set in stone from "on high" does not mean that anyone can do what the hell they like.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#29
RE: Denial of freedom
(May 29, 2013 at 1:51 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote:
(May 29, 2013 at 1:44 pm)dazzn Wrote: you choose to hoard, well I don't accept your right to do as such.

work to get what i want.
well, what you gonna do about it?!

(May 29, 2013 at 1:51 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(May 29, 2013 at 1:44 pm)dazzn Wrote: It depends. society says that "morals" are transient.

When did society get a voice.

Societies morals do move with the times.

Most societies no longer think that slavery is acceptable, rape is now an acknowledged thing within marriage and homosexuality is not illegal etc etc.

This I think shows that what is deemed moral can change over time in a secular society BUT only by the consent of society.

In this sense secular societies are much better than the intransigent theistic alternative.

Just because morals aren't set in stone from "on high" does not mean that anyone can do what the hell they like.

so then anything goes, as you rightly state that morals change.
Reply
#30
RE: Denial of freedom
You're equivocating again. One does not equal or follow from the other.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Human Freedom Ignorant 60 4817 April 15, 2016 at 7:27 pm
Last Post: Ignorant
  Problem of Divine Freedom MindForgedManacle 57 9506 April 21, 2014 at 3:27 pm
Last Post: Tonus
  Freedom of Religion rubikscube 198 61855 February 13, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Last Post: Epimethean



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)