Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 3:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
#41
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
It also was because that it's considered an illegal poll tax when a free voter ID is not offered.
Reply
#42
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
20 weeks is long enough to decide if you need an abortion or not. Not really that controversial of a law.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#43
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 9:56 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: 20 weeks is long enough to decide if you need an abortion or not. Not really that controversial of a law.

Just two points of concern:
1. The nose in the camel's tent. The anti-choice movement knows they can't get an outright ban so they're working on establishing precedent.
2. Medical emergencies need to be an exception always. Politicians can't play doctor.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#44
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 9:56 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: 20 weeks is long enough to decide if you need an abortion or not. Not really that controversial of a law.

What business is it of yours?
Reply
#45
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 10:56 am)Minimalist Wrote: What business is it of yours?

Because if he knocks up your mom he figures 20 weeks is long enough for him to decide if he's going to raise your new brother/sister or not.
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
Reply
#46
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 9:56 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: 20 weeks is long enough to decide if you need an abortion or not. Not really that controversial of a law.

The concern of the bill was NOT the provision for 20 weeks. The real issue was the increased requirements for abortion clinics, which are unreachable for 37 of the 42 available clinics in ALL of Texas. Texas is fucking huge. The idea behind the bill is basically to close most all of the abortion clinics, ergo nearly removing access to abortions all together for those who cannot travel.

The decreased availability, coupled with inability to travel = Exactly what they want
Reply
#47
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
Fear not. Perry is calling his fascist party back into session to make sure women in Texas are properly fucked over.
Reply
#48
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 12:25 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Fear not. Perry is calling his fascist party back into session to make sure women in Texas are properly fucked over.

Just what you'd expect from the party so concerned with fiscal responsibility (special sessions are expensive to run), small government, fewer regulations and, most of all, "jobs, jobs, jobs".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#49
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
(June 27, 2013 at 8:46 am)Rahul Wrote:
(June 26, 2013 at 10:13 pm)Polaris Wrote: But I'm more concerned with Texas thinking it's going to get away with it's Voter ID law, which will be repealed by Congress during the next session.

Actually both will likely be struck down for unConstitutionality....

Actually, I'm not really clear about why this is so controversial. Granted I'm probably missing something so hopefully someone can help clear this up for me.

This whole thing stems back to when a lot of southern states tried to prevent minorities from voting, correct? So the federal government ruled that certain states, and only certain states, that had a history of doing this couldn't enact any laws seen to try and do such a thing.

So while other states such as Wisconsin and Illinois states that you must show state issued identification in order to vote (which they do), other states like Texas and Mississippi can not. Right? Am I understanding this correctly?

Why don't you just go over to the DMV and grab an Indentification card? I don't see how it's ok for some states, in 2013, to say you have to have ID but it's not ok for other states to do the exact same thing.

And how is it unconstitutional? It's consititutional for the state of Illinois to have this requirement but it's unconstitutional for the state of Texas to have this requirement?

Someone help me out here. What'd I miss? Fuck I hate politics.

It's because 40 years ago, certain states were quite bad when it came to respecting the Civil Rights Act..that racism has spread westward and the Supreme Court ruled Section 4 unconstitutional to punish the same states for data that is 40 years old.

I see it as some Texan saying to invade Germany because they have the Nazi Party in power, which is obviously not the case.

Edit: but the GOP does have a point...I've been able to vote in California without being on the list for polling and did not even need an ID...they just let me vote...not sure if they threw it out in Sacramento though.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#50
RE: TX Republicans kill filibuster, essentially ending abortion in state
Quote:It's because 40 years ago, certain states were quite bad when it comes to respecting the Civil Rights Act


Just like today.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ayn Rand blamed for current state of America Foxaèr 61 3094 June 24, 2021 at 6:17 pm
Last Post: no one
  Cheney challenger admits to statutory rape: Republicans don't care Rev. Rye 39 2084 May 28, 2021 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Has Mark Samsel Done A Good Job As A Kansas State Representative? BrianSoddingBoru4 11 1087 May 3, 2021 at 10:56 am
Last Post: GUBU
  High percent of republicans refusing covid vaccination brewer 36 3259 March 24, 2021 at 7:47 pm
Last Post: brewer
  An honest question for the Republicans Foxaèr 26 1284 November 20, 2020 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Separation of Science and State John 6IX Breezy 233 10402 November 19, 2020 at 7:44 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why is Vatican a state? Fake Messiah 13 1289 November 11, 2020 at 9:07 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Question About Republicans DeistPaladin 13 1297 September 22, 2020 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Trump’s evangelical adviser to Jim Bakker: ‘It’s not Republicans vs Dems — it’s God v Secular Elf 6 828 March 4, 2020 at 12:27 am
Last Post: Ranjr
Big Grin Democrats VS Republicans I believe in Harry Potter 17 1973 October 28, 2019 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Alan V



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)