Posts: 1152
Threads: 42
Joined: July 8, 2013
Reputation:
23
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 10, 2013 at 8:30 pm
(July 10, 2013 at 5:45 pm)Godschild Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 3:52 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: Yes, and it flew right by you again. Stop leaning over to smell your own farts, and you might actually get a moment to understand what someone is saying to you.
Nothing flew by me, this has been explained many times on here, yet no one will remember what was said. You all do this so you do not have to go look up something else to argue about. As long as you can keep the same old trash going around you will not have to see the truth. Now talk about people who use circular reasoning, around and around you go with the same old tired arguments, you're lazy and afraid of truth.
A circular argument is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is assumed in a premise, not when a topic or response comes up repeatedly.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 10, 2013 at 11:18 pm
(July 10, 2013 at 8:30 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 5:45 pm)Godschild Wrote: Nothing flew by me, this has been explained many times on here, yet no one will remember what was said. You all do this so you do not have to go look up something else to argue about. As long as you can keep the same old trash going around you will not have to see the truth. Now talk about people who use circular reasoning, around and around you go with the same old tired arguments, you're lazy and afraid of truth.
A circular argument is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is assumed in a premise, not when a topic or response comes up repeatedly.
I know that, a play on words, get real.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 324
Threads: 41
Joined: July 7, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 10, 2013 at 11:22 pm
(July 10, 2013 at 2:00 pm)Godschild Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 1:50 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: Lol, what science does god have knowledge of?
Things you could not possibly understand.
(July 10, 2013 at 4:21 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: So I'm trying to comprehend your logic, please correct me if I'm wrong. If objective reality is part of God, then God is not an individual with arms, hands, and human features?
To be more incisive, what precisely is God? Is he/she/it a philosophy? Is God a representative of universal truth? Fill me in on this, please.
God says He is spirit, meaning He has no physical features like we do, God is a real being, not a philosophy.
That's stupid. "Oh, I can't understand anything in your religion because of its special logic that only people in your church can understand."
Posts: 2921
Threads: 26
Joined: June 25, 2013
Reputation:
41
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 10, 2013 at 11:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2013 at 11:39 pm by Bad Writer.)
(July 10, 2013 at 11:18 pm)Godschild Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 8:30 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote: A circular argument is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is assumed in a premise, not when a topic or response comes up repeatedly.
I know that, a play on words, get real.
Bwahahahaha!!! GC, reading your posts is like watching an episode of Bill Cosby's "Kids say the Darndest Things".
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 12:15 am
(July 10, 2013 at 11:22 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 2:00 pm)Godschild Wrote: Things you could not possibly understand.
God says He is spirit, meaning He has no physical features like we do, God is a real being, not a philosophy.
That's stupid. "Oh, I can't understand anything in your religion because of its special logic that only people in your church can understand."
Why is that stupid?
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 2921
Threads: 26
Joined: June 25, 2013
Reputation:
41
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 12:22 am
(July 11, 2013 at 12:15 am)Godschild Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 11:22 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote: That's stupid. "Oh, I can't understand anything in your religion because of its special logic that only people in your church can understand."
Why is that stupid?
Special logic is stupid by default. I'm sorry that you are subject to it.
Posts: 324
Threads: 41
Joined: July 7, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 1:39 am
(July 11, 2013 at 12:15 am)Godschild Wrote: (July 10, 2013 at 11:22 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote: That's stupid. "Oh, I can't understand anything in your religion because of its special logic that only people in your church can understand."
Why is that stupid?
It is stupid because every rational person can understand the fundamentals of logic. Everyone can understand cause and effect, and inductive and deductive logic. You are saying "well, there is a special type of logic (which doesn't make sense) that only church-goers can use". That is illogical and stupid. Logic is something every rational human being can understand; not just the church goers.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 1:44 am
(July 11, 2013 at 1:39 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: (July 11, 2013 at 12:15 am)Godschild Wrote: Why is that stupid?
It is stupid because every rational person can understand the fundamentals of logic. Everyone can understand cause and effect, and inductive and deductive logic. You are saying "well, there is a special type of logic (which doesn't make sense) that only church-goers can use". That is illogical and stupid. Logic is something every rational human being can understand; not just the church goers.
Why is this so hard to understand, Jesus saves all who come unto Him. No special logic there.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 324
Threads: 41
Joined: July 7, 2013
Reputation:
9
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 1:51 am
(July 11, 2013 at 1:44 am)Godschild Wrote: (July 11, 2013 at 1:39 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: It is stupid because every rational person can understand the fundamentals of logic. Everyone can understand cause and effect, and inductive and deductive logic. You are saying "well, there is a special type of logic (which doesn't make sense) that only church-goers can use". That is illogical and stupid. Logic is something every rational human being can understand; not just the church goers.
Why is this so hard to understand, Jesus saves all who come unto Him. No special logic there.
If I have to find Jesus, does that mean he's hiding?
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
July 11, 2013 at 1:56 am
Mike,
You're new here so let me clue you in. G-C really thinks his bullshit is true and his invisible sky daddy is waiting for him in fucking heaven.
|