Phil from Duck Dynasty gets in trouble for being against homosexuality

[Raeven]

Do you enjoy the freedom of not having to be tolerant of someone's views?

Of course. So does Phil. You're really attempting to conflate two issues here: Freedom of speech with consequences for expressing one's views.

Phil is free to speak is views. So am I. We both must be prepared to accept the consequences for having them.

See how simple this is?

[Psykhronic]

So A&E decided 'fuck it, let him back on' and you know what? I do not care. Nothing that happened to Phil was outrageous. This was the network's call. There were no legal ramifications to his speech, nor was he silenced in any way.

[Cinjin]

I've never watched the show because I LOATHE rednecks and I have a hatred for the sheeple living in the south that use the bible as a guideline for all their stupidity.

That being said, I agree with the OP. One man's bigoted remarks about homosexuals doesn't warrant the reaction. Surprise surprise, dumb christards don't like homosexuals. Big fucking deal. The man's a useless piece of shit who admits to beating his wife while having extra-marital sexual liaisons. In my opinion, NO ONE should watch this show ... but it has nothing to do with his homophobic remarks. He's a redneck fucktard who manages only to strengthen the stereotype that all Americans are stupid and further exacerbates the hatred that foreigners have for our country.

You were right to call is Suck Dynasty, but I'll do one better. Fuck Dynasty and fuck you Phil Robertson for being yet another hypocrite christard who has no problem bashing that which he does not understand while ignoring his own massive faults.

[Brakeman]

No it's not ok to let him back on without a fight.
It's none of his damn business what other people do with their love lives and he should be castigated harshly for pronouncing it on nationwide media. It doesn't matter how prevalent this hurtful dogma is, we are above this bronze age phobia and we should actively repulse it whenever the opportunity strikes.

I encourage you to watch this video that switched the rolls and then think about the correct action to take over Phil's disgusting screed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnOJgDW0gPI

[Ryantology]

Well, now he's encouraging men to marry girls underage, because women over 20 are gold diggers or something. Guess statutory rape is a good Christian virtue right next to racism and homophobia.

[Belac Enrobso]

Phil Robertson is the devil! Ma-m-mama says so!

[Chad32]

Well, now he's encouraging men to marry girls underage, because women over 20 are gold diggers or something. Guess statutory rape is a good Christian virtue right next to racism and homophobia.

Nice old testament family values, there. I've heard divorce rates rise if people get married younger, but I'm sure he'd be fine with divorce being illegal. Also the woman belongs to her husband, so it's not rape if they're married. You silly.

I'm liking him less and less with these videos they're digging up.

[EgoRaptor]

To be honest I could understand banning divorce. Don't pledge yourself to someone if you aren't positive you want to spend your life with them. Also, there is a thing called open marriage.

[Chad32]

There's no way to be sure that you'll feel the same way ten or twenty years down the road that you do now. Especially since it's common for people to not move in together before getting married.