Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 1:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Elbow Room by Den Dennett
#1
Elbow Room by Den Dennett
A few moments ago I finished Dan Dennett's Elbow Room. This thread is for those who have read the book, or are familiar with Dennett's compatibalism, who would like to discuss his arguments in the book or in general if you have not read that specific work.

Honestly, I'm slightly underwhelmed, though I regrettably confess that my inexperience in dealing with analytic philosophy probably limited my exposure to the full force of his argument. I love Dan's writing style and the way his brain works but on this particular issue, I yearned for something a bit more clear and straightforward. That's not to say anything in particular tripped me up but his gradual case never really seemed to seal the deal that the "free will problem" is solved, or if merely dissolved, doesn't look more and more like Harris' hard determinism. Admittedly, Dan's only intent may have been to get my intuitions pumping, and on that front he succeeded. Still, I can see why people prefer Harris' hard determinism (to say nothing of it's "implications" for responsibility and morality) based on Harris' clear and precise presentation alone.

So what do you think? Do you remember anything from the book that stood out to you as a particularly strong defense of free will or anything that was just plain weak?

Overall, I gather that Dennett is saying something like, a simple machine with one operating function is an obvious example of determined outcomes. Push the button and the light comes on. Or shove a boulder and it rolls down the hill. Local fatalism, as Dan calls it. But when we add billions of parts and an infinite amount of potential button-pushers or boulder-shovers, *blur-blur-obfuscation-blur-blur-blur* the complex machine with billions of mechanisms and infinite potential pressure selectors now has something like free will and that is something we should want! I just don't see what makes human brains fundamentally different, given their dependence on the fixed laws of nature, that give our off-centered "selves" or sense of self some sort of self-empowerment beyond the illusion of free will Harris claims we can and should practically maintain. Nor do I see how some events in the universe could be free from local fatalism, if determinism is true, at least on the macroscopic level (i.e. classical, Newtonian physics). By the way, I really hope those two debate.
Reply
#2
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett


It's probably been 20 years since I read it, so I don't remember it at all well. However, my recollection of it was that he wasn't so much trying to argue for a specific view of free will as he was trying to clear away some of the brambles clogging up common viewpoints on the question. To my recollection, he did exceedingly well on that score. However, if you're looking for a definitive argument from Dennett in Elbow Room, I think you'll be disappointed. I think, given that he covers a range of possible meanings, my take on it was that the book was more a primer to prepare you for thinking about the question. This is probably why he came back to the question with a book length treatment in Freedom Evolves, which to my mind is a rather flawed work. (And others have commented that they found the reading and following Dennett's argument there difficult. I imagine this is in part due to his argument involving some equivocation on the main point; he tries to sneak teleology into his argument through the back door of adaptationist language, and to my mind, that's simply unworkable.)


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#3
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett
(January 26, 2014 at 7:37 pm)rasetsu Wrote:

I imagine this is in part due to his argument involving some equivocation on the main point; he tries to sneak teleology into his argument through the back door of adaptationist language, and to my mind, that's simply unworkable.)



Can you elaborate on that point?
Reply
#4
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett
Elbow Room The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (1984) is a book by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett.
Reply
#5
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett
(February 8, 2014 at 2:57 am)safa100 Wrote: Elbow Room The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (1984) is a book by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett.

Thinking
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#6
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett
(February 8, 2014 at 2:57 am)safa100 Wrote: Elbow Room The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (1984) is a book by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett.
/thread
Reply
#7
RE: Elbow Room by Den Dennett
(February 8, 2014 at 2:57 am)safa100 Wrote: Elbow Room The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (1984) is a book by the American philosopher Daniel Dennett.

Looking at this individuals five posts so far, I'm suspecting a bot.
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dennett throws down the gloves and pummels Sam Harris right in the gut Mudhammam 37 9698 March 18, 2014 at 11:56 am
Last Post: tor
  Dan Dennett On Consciousness Edwardo Piet 1 1205 November 14, 2012 at 6:32 pm
Last Post: liam



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)