Mullah rapes 10 year old, family want to kill child...

[Chad32]

Few things can cause a good person to commit evil deeds like religion can.

[Cato]

Let's take two bads and make a right. The U.S. drone program has been criticized on more than one occaision for fucking up weddings. Keep the child at a safe distance, gather the mullah and family for the ceremony, give the CIA the address...problems solved. Trigger happy drone pilots are satiated and despicable cunts die.

[Rev. Rye]

Seriously what the **** is wrong with these people?
First a cleric rapes a 10 year old (who subsequently needed medical treatment) then the girl's family openly plan her 'honour killing', and just to cap it off the local cops remove the girl from the shelter where she was being protected to hand her back to her would-be killers...
Do all these arseholes need putting in straight jackets?

You know, the sad thing is, as someone who's lived through a traumatic childhood, I can almost ("almost" being the key word) understand the impulse to kill her, if only because, especially in such a repressive climate, things can only get worse. I can easily imagine her life ending up like a Muslim Tess Durbeyfield.

Of course, killing her as a matter of honour? And the authorities know about this and actually facilitate it? That's truly fucked up. And, seriously, if they were so damn intent on killing their daughter, why broadcast it and not just do it?

[Wyrd of Gawd]

But you see.. these are EXTREMISTS and don't practice the good/normal/non-fucked up version of Islam we've all come to know and love. It's not called the Religion of Peace without good cause!

True Muslims would never EVER do such horrible things! Mostly.

Or, apparently, stand up to these thugs in the name of their religion.

It seems that until "extremist" Muslims stop being ashamed of their own penises, stop fearing vaginas, and stop thinking of their wives and daughters as disposable property there is little to be done besides putting bullets in their fucking heads. I lack the words to express how deeply I loathe these barbarians.

Evidently the muslim women like it otherwise they would change it.

[vodkafan]

Of course, killing her as a matter of honour? And the authorities know about this and actually facilitate it? That's truly fucked up. And, seriously, if they were so damn intent on killing their daughter, why broadcast it and not just do it?

'coz that's the whole point of honour killings.....it has to be seen to have been done to wipe the "dishonour" away.

[Mr Greene]

It takes a lot to make the child rapist look like the good guy, but this bunch almost manage it.
Seriously, beyond advocating an act of genocide it's hard to see what could possibly be an appropriate response.
Calling them 'barbaric' is a serious insult to barbarians, indeed they're an insult to the species if not the entire planet.
Frankly I'd have the ones calling for the girls killing rounded up and rip their throats out with my teeth and castrate the cleric with a brick.

[Dystopia]

I refuse to embrace fully the multicultural view because it would force me to accept Islam culture and religion. Am I a bigot for this? I don't consider my decision irrational. Multiculturalism should be used in moderation, not in a way that it makes relative all cultural practices

[vorlon13]

It's not like the family is going to turn the dead child over to the Aghoris for funerary purposes to complete the multi-cultural tableau.

[Simon Moon]

Because it equates life with money. That equation marks the person making it as a sociopath, and that's a mighty hard condition to cure.

What if someone murders for inheritance or insurance money?

Isn't that equating life with money?

What about a serial killer? Aren't they mighty hard to cure?


So, don't try to cure them. Lock them away for the rest of their lives.

Why shoulod I care about that? That isn't what is driving my opinion, thanks. I'm for executing fairly-convicted child molesters because their proclivity is virtually impossible to "cure".

There are many other sociopathic behaviors that are nearly impossible to cure that do not result in the death of the victim, why isolate this one?

Why not life in prison without parole, or castration?

I don't see that as useful, myself, because no amount of retribution repairs the damage. The two instances in which I support it aren't driven by the deisre to pay back the crime, but rather, as a prophylactic, to prevent recidivism in two instances given the difficulty of changing those behaviors.

Kleptomania and arsonists (the sociopathic ones) are hard to cure. Should we kill them?