Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 2:08 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
*******
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 46031
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 109
#11
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 7:27 pm
Not that I wish to see a creationist win a debate, but I'd like to see - at least once - one of them use debating tactics that don't consist of:

1. Squinching their eyes shut.

2. Jamming their fingers in their ears, and

3. Shouting 'Neener neener, I can't hear you!!'

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply
pocaracas Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Religious Views: Non-believer
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation: 92
#12
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 9:17 pm
Esq, this guy is on record as saying things like 'evolution it's a lie" and "the fossil record is a lie".
I'm waiting to see how many lies he spots in your opening statement, not to mention the links you provide.
Science is biased towards naturalistic explanations, remember?
Find
Reply
bennyboy Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: agnostic
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation: 46
#13
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:37 pm
Ummmm. . . isn't there a peanut gallery just for threads like this?
Find
Reply
Dolorian Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 524
Threads: 30
Joined: August 16, 2014
Reputation: 6
#14
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:47 pm
(November 10, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Beccs Wrote: [Image: 1426772397_eat20popcorn.png]

Mind sharing some of that popcorn? Tongue
Find
Reply
The Valkyrie Offline
The last smile some will see...
*******
Religious Views: Time to end them
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation: 146
#15
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:48 pm
(November 10, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Dolorian Wrote:
(November 10, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Beccs Wrote: [Image: 1426772397_eat20popcorn.png]

Mind sharing some of that popcorn? Tongue

Too late.

All gone.

Tongue

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Find
Reply
Dolorian Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 524
Threads: 30
Joined: August 16, 2014
Reputation: 6
#16
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:57 pm (This post was last modified: November 10, 2014 at 10:58 pm by Dolorian.)
(November 10, 2014 at 10:48 pm)Beccs Wrote: Too late.

All gone.

Tongue

Already? I told you to bring the whole box Sad

What are we supposed to eat now? Babies? :p
Find
Reply
SteelCurtain Offline
Milk Chocolate Bimbo/Swag Master
*****
Religious Views: Atheist (6)
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation: 117
#17
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 12:28 am
Candied babies are proper for an event such as this.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Find
Reply
Crossless2.0 Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation: 54
#18
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 2:32 am
We're one post into this fias-- . . . debate, and I'm already reminded of something I read in the Bible about pearls and swine.
Find
Reply
Fidel_Castronaut Away
Give what back?
****
Religious Views: ブーニベルゼ
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation: 104
#19
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 3:56 am
(November 10, 2014 at 10:37 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Ummmm. . . isn't there a peanut gallery just for threads like this?

Would appear not - we'll set one up.
Please take a moment to read the updated AtheistForums.org rules here 
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Find
Reply
Mudhammam Offline
Disciple of Nature
****
Religious Views: anti-theist (towards 98.5% of deities)
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation: 60
#20
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 9:45 am (This post was last modified: November 11, 2014 at 9:47 am by Mudhammam.)
So when does His_Majesty make his opening statement? We might have to wait a week for this?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Relationship between programming languages and natural languages FlatAssembler 13 1696 June 12, 2023 at 9:39 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  The difference between computing and science. highdimensionman 0 451 February 25, 2022 at 11:54 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  Free Will Debate Alan V 82 7574 November 27, 2021 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Debate Invitation John 6IX Breezy 3 797 September 1, 2019 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion bennyboy 238 24364 October 8, 2018 at 3:20 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread Whateverist 598 84004 June 12, 2018 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
Thumbs Up VOTE HERE: Final four questions for the Christian Debate vulcanlogician 43 5528 May 18, 2018 at 10:23 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  1st Call for Christian Only Debate: Our Role on AF Neo-Scholastic 132 19989 May 4, 2018 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Hybrid theory between freewill and determinism Won2blv 18 4846 July 26, 2017 at 10:57 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  How can you tell the difference between reality and delusions? Adventurer 19 7738 June 13, 2017 at 5:14 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)