Posts: 46031
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 7:27 pm
Not that I wish to see a creationist win a debate, but I'd like to see - at least once - one of them use debating tactics that don't consist of:
1. Squinching their eyes shut.
2. Jamming their fingers in their ears, and
3. Shouting 'Neener neener, I can't hear you!!'
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 9:17 pm
Esq, this guy is on record as saying things like 'evolution it's a lie" and "the fossil record is a lie".
I'm waiting to see how many lies he spots in your opening statement, not to mention the links you provide.
Science is biased towards naturalistic explanations, remember?
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:37 pm
Ummmm. . . isn't there a peanut gallery just for threads like this?
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 10, 2014 at 10:48 pm
(November 10, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Dolorian Wrote: (November 10, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Beccs Wrote:
Mind sharing some of that popcorn?
Too late.
All gone.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 12:28 am
Candied babies are proper for an event such as this.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 2:32 am
We're one post into this fias-- . . . debate, and I'm already reminded of something I read in the Bible about pearls and swine.
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 11, 2014 at 9:45 am
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2014 at 9:47 am by Mudhammam.)
So when does His_Majesty make his opening statement? We might have to wait a week for this?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza