Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 16, 2024, 6:02 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
Exian Offline
Top Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation: 55
#81
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 9:44 pm
(November 13, 2014 at 9:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote: [Image: db051218.gif]

Ha! When I was writing that Dr. Xtard thing, this came to mind. I thought about finding it, but I couldn't remember where I saw it or what strip it was from. Furthermore, I thought "I bet Min will post it, and get my back." Kudos, sir.
Find
Reply
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 259
#82
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 9:49 pm
I saved that to a safe place years ago. Used it many times.

Along with this.

[Image: kkk_jesus_saves.gif]


Jesus freaks hate that one.
Find
Reply
Jackalope Offline
Completely out of fucks
*******
Religious Views: Absent
Posts: 30728
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation: 141
#83
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 9:54 pm
The debate can continue - HM's first post will count as his first rebuttal, and he isbexpected to post an opening argument before Esquilax has to respond. Both participants have been notified by PM what is expected of them.

I'm unlocking the thread so HM can post his argument.
Find
Reply
Esquilax Offline
A Death Star for bad arguments.
*****
Religious Views: AF's own William Lane Craig
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation: 123
#84
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 9:57 pm
For the sake of transparency, I will say that my immediate reaction upon seeing what happened was to request that the debate continue. I didn't want to let it end on a technicality, and I'm glad it gets to continue now.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Find
Reply
Jackalope Offline
Completely out of fucks
*******
Religious Views: Absent
Posts: 30728
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation: 141
#85
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 9:58 pm
(November 13, 2014 at 9:57 pm)Esquilax Wrote: For the sake of transparency, I will say that my immediate reaction upon seeing what happened was to request that the debate continue. I didn't want to let it end on a technicality, and I'm glad it gets to continue now.

Ditto, but it wouldn't have been fair to expect you to continue with the irregularity uncorrected. Glad a solution was found.
Find
Reply
SteelCurtain Offline
Milk Chocolate Bimbo/Swag Master
*****
Religious Views: Atheist (6)
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation: 117
#86
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 10:20 pm (This post was last modified: November 13, 2014 at 10:20 pm by SteelCurtain.)
So he challenged everyone here to debates, then shows he has zero idea how debates go.

Well, I hope he takes a little more time formulating an opening statement. The first rebuttal was embarrassing...
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Find
Reply
Exian Offline
Top Member
****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation: 55
#87
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 10:33 pm
(November 13, 2014 at 9:49 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I saved that to a safe place years ago. Used it many times.

Along with this.

[Image: kkk_jesus_saves.gif]


Jesus freaks hate that one.

That's just perfect.
Find
Reply
rexbeccarox Offline
Getting there...
*****
Religious Views: none
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation: 84
#88
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 10:43 pm
The Dunning Kreuger effect is definitely strong with His Maj.
Find
Reply
Losty Offline
LastPoet’s jerkoff #4
*****
Religious Views: Pastafarian
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation: 185
#89
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 10:44 pm (This post was last modified: November 13, 2014 at 11:02 pm by Losty.)
(November 13, 2014 at 3:00 pm)Esquilax Wrote: So, like, does anyone have any thoughts about my opening statement, in the meantime? Tongue

*Losty runs off to actually read Esqui's opening statement.

Angel
Very educational. I will admit, I knew next to nothing about evolution before reading your post.

Oh let me compliment both players.

HisMajesty, your post was also um...cute.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Find
Reply
Dolorian Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 524
Threads: 30
Joined: August 16, 2014
Reputation: 6
#90
RE: Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.
November 13, 2014 at 11:08 pm (This post was last modified: November 13, 2014 at 11:12 pm by Dolorian.)
His_Majesty Wrote:The only thing we see in the present day is animals producing their own kind...dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats, and fish produce fish...so on and so forth. This is MICROEVOLUTION, people...I agree, microevolution happens every day..but a dog producing a dog is a lot different than a reptile changing to a bird...which is something we DON'Tsee.

Never mind that His_Majesty doesn't explains what he means by "kind" (an antiquated concept). This statement from him reveals to me a common yet fundamental misunderstanding about how evolution works. Under evolution, a member of one species doesn't produce a member of some other species. Rather, the gradual and small changes that species undergo over many generations lead to an accumulation of features and differences that in turn lead to speciation and divergence. But at every step along the line, we always have living organisms producing members of their own species.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Relationship between programming languages and natural languages FlatAssembler 13 1293 June 12, 2023 at 9:39 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  The difference between computing and science. highdimensionman 0 379 February 25, 2022 at 11:54 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  Free Will Debate Alan V 82 5260 November 27, 2021 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Debate Invitation John 6IX Breezy 3 700 September 1, 2019 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion bennyboy 238 19606 October 8, 2018 at 3:20 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread Whateverist 598 72312 June 12, 2018 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
Thumbs Up VOTE HERE: Final four questions for the Christian Debate vulcanlogician 43 4617 May 18, 2018 at 10:23 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  1st Call for Christian Only Debate: Our Role on AF Neo-Scholastic 132 17909 May 4, 2018 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Hybrid theory between freewill and determinism Won2blv 18 4323 July 26, 2017 at 10:57 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  How can you tell the difference between reality and delusions? Azu 19 7067 June 13, 2017 at 5:14 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)