Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 5:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm)Jenny A Wrote: How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.

no they would split knowledge like that so they are 3 flawed beings but yet one perfect super being that has no free will because he know everything. yeah this seems legit..legitimately stupid.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm)Jenny A Wrote: How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.

Here's something about the same in terms of credibility, and similar thematically as well.




Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Clearly, H_M has reached the "bury them in bullshit" phase, and we've countered with "point and laugh". Right on schedule.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 1:06 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Clearly, H_M has reached the "bury them in bullshit" phase, and we've countered with "point and laugh". Right on schedule.

Next in my program, shitposting .gifs from hell. Pray you don't ban me for it!

Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
We had this little rhyme when we were kids, not sure what the deal was:

I have the power
To pick up a flower
But it takes me an hour
Or more

Still more power than God. He can't even stop his followers getting banned on forums. Or maybe he equates it to his own sacrifice. About the same level of inconvenience caused.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: You people are campaigning to create rules to limit my effectiveness. Kinda reminds me of the Great Wilt Chamberlain..and how he used to dominate the NBA during the early days...the league implemented the 3 second rule in the paint because they couldn't let one man just completely dominate the rest of the league. ROFLOL

What a bunch of crybabies.

Not that the rest of your constant switching between whining and desperate, compensatory grandstanding isn't worth commenting on, but are you actually under the impression that the roflol emoticon this bulletin board platform provides plays a substantial role in the efficacy of your arguments?

That says a lot about the intellectual content of your posts. Undecided
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I think I can close this discussion out.

I just met god and he says you're completely wrong about everything. [Unfalsifiable claim]

Unless you can prove what I just said is wrong, then it is right and we win. [Theistic logic]

Pack up shop, we've seen it all now and it ain't pretty.

I'm happy to take a lack of response as a victory, too. [Theistic logic]
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:
(December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Maybe we can create a rule that limits the number you can use each year?

There are some rare occasions I've been inspired enough to use it. When it appears in every other post, sometimes multiple times, you're abusing it.

You people are campaigning to create rules to limit my effectiveness. Kinda reminds me of the Great Wilt Chamberlain..and how he used to dominate the NBA during the early days...the league implemented the 3 second rule in the paint because they couldn't let one man just completely dominate the rest of the league. ROFLOL

What a bunch of crybabies.

Yeah but you're not Michael Jordan. I could build a better case than you, since it's obvious you're not as well educated as you think you are. (And don't give me that "satan knows the word crap")

You and your faulty Bible are, and will continue limiting you, not the moderators. This is an obvious case of displaced frustration, and mods are the easiest target.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I think we won, that was a decent amount of time to respond. Well, good game all! No jesus today.

Debating is so easy with theistic logic.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 4146 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 6387 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 9376 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 4066 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 4286 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1702 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 4129 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 3429 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20895 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2487 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)