Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 4:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Laser Weapon Operational
#11
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
Quote:The US navy has demonstrated a shark-mounted laser weapon system.

This is the headline everyone really wants to see.
Reply
#12
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
Specifically, frickin' sharks with frickin' laser beams strapped to their frickin' heads.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#13
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
I'm sure a cubical, retroreflector for returning enough of a laser beam to the source laser could not be machined precisely enough to do the job. Also, whatever is being attacked would need to be completely covered with the retroreflectors, and there would a prohibitive cost, either weight, performance or cost that could not be overcome, even if it would work.

Further, if a retroreflector did work well enough to do the job, the energy in the beam would double every interval of time it takes for the beam to go between the laser and the target and back. Either the laser or the retroreflector will fail first as the power increases, or, if used in the atmosphere, the beam energy will become high enough that interactions with the air will defocus the beam, and neither would be destroyed.
Reply
#14
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
Somehow I suspect that in an actual attack they would simply blast the boat first and not worry about the occupants. We even have a term for it.

Collateral damage.
Reply
#15
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
Well, the surest way to kill sailors at sea is to sink their vessel, yeah.

Reply
#16
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
Environmental damage from, for instance, depleted uranium projectiles, would not occur with the laser. With a wind turbine or tidal power source, the environmental footprint is pretty small.

I'm looking at the first 'green' weapon.
Reply
#17
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
How long has Rhythm been a mod. Who agreed to that administration? Don't y'all know better?
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#18
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
(December 11, 2014 at 3:13 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: With a wind turbine or tidal power source, the environmental footprint is pretty small.

So are the three light bulbs that they can power.
Reply
#19
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
(December 11, 2014 at 3:16 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: How long has Rhythm been a mod. Who agreed to that administration? Don't y'all know better?
Even if they didn't, the way he kept coughing and snickering when they were interviewing him should've been a tip-off.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#20
RE: Laser Weapon Operational
(December 11, 2014 at 1:29 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Could a reflector survive long enough to reflect a sufficient amount of light to damage the weapon? Or would it last long enough to deflect the beam?

Since reflector is reflecting rather than absorbing most of the laser energy, I am sure it can survive a lot longer than a weapon which would end up absorbing the energy.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  US may launch strike if North Korea moves to test nuclear weapon Aegon 53 6264 April 18, 2017 at 3:19 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)