The genetic similarity between man and Cambanzy Is it true?

[robvalue]

Lol

I didn't even get the gist of what the article was about while I skimmed it, apart from more anti-evolution nonsense. What the hell is a cambanzy? Im not getting many google hits. Is this a creationist invented word?

[king krish]

Why i cant share links !!!
The links for sience magazines .. So what is the problem ????

---

I'm here to talk seriously so I hope members should stop kidding
i hope the admin dont delet the links

[robvalue]

It's part of the forum rules, I suggest you check them out again.

You need to have been a member for 30 days and made 30 posts first.

[Exian]

Have we pinned down the definition of cambanzy yet? Funny enough the only google result I get is to a Charles Darwin parody account on twitter. Nothing comes up when I follow the link, so maybe it's a comment on a Charles Darwin tweet buried somewhere in the feed? I think either king kirsh commented on a joke tweet, or he is the account and is therefor likely a trolly-poe man thing.

[Alex K]

I think our friend is spelling Chimpanzee phonetically in his or her dialect...

[Nope]

Why i cant share links !!!
The links for sience magazines .. So what is the problem ????

---

I'm here to talk seriously so I hope members should stop kidding
i hope the admin dont delet the links

You just have to wait a few days. I think that it is meant to cut down on the number of spam that gets posted to this site.

[robvalue]

Ah chimpanzee? Well that would make a lot more sense. Yes, our DNA is very close to that of chimpanzees.

Is that meant to disprove evolution? I physically can't wade through all that post as it stands, I'll wait for a link or something.

If the article is claiming we're not genetically similar, then it's bound to be nonsense. If it's claiming we are and that troubles evolution... Also nonsense.

Wow, this is what it must feel like to be religious! I can just cut stuff down without having to think about it.

[polar bear]

You lost me at the title of your OP. There is a lot of stuff and a lot of links. Can we start with your first few thoughts and work from there?

[popeyespappy]

It's true, people are 98% Chimpanzee and 2% Banana.

It's probably more like 95% chimp 25% banana. You can also add 85% cow, 65% chicken, 44% honey bee and 18% baker's yeast. All that together makes us 332% human.

[TheRealJoeFish]

It's true, people are 98% Chimpanzee and 2% Banana.

It's probably more like 95% chimp 25% banana. You can also add 85% cow, 65% chicken, 44% honey bee and 18% baker's yeast. All that together makes us 332% human.

Bender: I'm forty percent human!

---

But also, I think the OP was a blog post, in some language other than English, translated crudely to English by an engine, anthologizing the work of the good doctors Jerry Bergman (a YEC who I believe is affiliated with the Institute for Creation Research), Durrett and Smith, and others. Basically, a compendium of articles by the handful of d00ds out there who are actively attacking the validity of all of the DNA evidence that points to common ancestry of humans and chimpanzees.