Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 10:32 am

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Daystar
RE: Daystar
(December 15, 2008 at 3:45 pm)Daystar Wrote: They could have easily demonstrated this, not that it would be necessary to do so for anyone other than a complete idiot or someone trying to convince a complete idiot of evolution.

Steady now.
Reply
RE: Daystar
(December 15, 2008 at 6:05 am)lukec Wrote: I respectfully disagree, Kyu, although I understand where you're coming from. Daystar and I very rarely see eye to eye, and are often butting heads, but frankly I wouldn't post nearly as much as I do if he wasn't here, for two reasons. First, when he posts something, it often spurs me to start doing some research, and I've had reason to use my school's resource of peer-reviewed and am learning as I go, which I really like. Second, there is no point in preaching to the choir, and I'd rather flat out argue with Daystar, who brings up many creationist points and lets me look into them for myself and look at why exactly they are wrong, or misleading.

I appreciate that, Lukec. It is a compliment to be told that you provoked someone to think and discover even their own truth, but people get tired of someone who might appear to make them look foolish. They want a message board where it is easy for them to make the other side look foolish. That doesn't require much thought, as a side benefit.
(December 15, 2008 at 2:08 pm)LukeMC Wrote: If he behaved more like CoxRox things would be okay. With CoxRox we can meet in the middle and work from there. An argument between us and Daystar is like two brick walls being smashed into each other at equal speed.

I think I posted here a month before I even knew CoxRox was a theist, and I still have my doubts. You want someone who isn't a threat and makes you feel cozy and superior in mentoring them away from the other side.

Xian forums have those as well.
(December 15, 2008 at 2:09 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I ask, Daystar, do you actually know what the burden of proof is? Or are you just ignorant or refuse to admit you have no evidence on the matter and only have "faith".

I have told you repeatedly that I don't care about proving anything to you. And don't take this personally, but you couldn't debate your own ass out of a wet paper sack.
Reply
RE: Daystar
(December 15, 2008 at 3:58 pm)LukeMC Wrote:
(December 15, 2008 at 3:45 pm)Daystar Wrote: They could have easily demonstrated this, not that it would be necessary to do so for anyone other than a complete idiot or someone trying to convince a complete idiot of evolution.

Steady now.

Indeed.

Ease off a little on that please daystar.
Thanks.Smile
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
RE: Daystar
Quote:
(December 15, 2008 at 2:08 pm)LukeMC Wrote: If he behaved more like CoxRox things would be okay. With CoxRox we can meet in the middle and work from there. An argument between us and Daystar is like two brick walls being smashed into each other at equal speed.

I think I posted here a month before I even knew CoxRox was a theist, and I still have my doubts. You want someone who isn't a threat and makes you feel cozy and superior in mentoring them away from the other side.

Xian forums have those as well.

CoxRox is sat on the fence, willing to research both sides.
Us atheists are decided and awaiting contrary evidence (evidence of God).
You are decided and continue to fail in providing evidence, yet still yap on about us being ignorant, stupid, religious, etc.

If you wanted me to pray to God for a few months whilst reading the bible from a neutral standpoint and get back to you, that would be fine. But instead you keep telling us the bible is true and then quote the bible as evidence, even though your quotations bare no resemblance to evidence for the truth of the bible Confused
Reply
RE: Daystar
(December 15, 2008 at 2:09 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: The thing is: I am perfectly happy to debate with him if he'll either admit that he has "faith" and no evidence. Or he'll actually provide evidence.

Daystar, I'm afraid has no evidence, he is content to use the creationist tactics of picking holes and dismissing major scientific theories on the basis of "common sense" or personal incredulity.

If Daystar had any real evidence he would surely have provided it in response to some of the questions he is so carefully avoiding.

(December 15, 2008 at 2:09 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I ask, Daystar, do you actually know what the burden of proof is? Or are you just ignorant or refuse to admit you have no evidence on the matter and only have "faith".

Given that Daystar is an ex-police officer one might be tempted to think he'd know the difference between what is and is not evidence, but scientific evidence is somewhat more demanding than legal and my experience of the police and the legal system in general is that they are nowhere near as fair, or concerned about the truth, as people might like to believe. I strongly suspect that Daystar is of this mould and wouldn't know real scientific evidence if it was a wet kipper beating him repeatedly around the head.

As Jeremy Clarkson once said, "The Juries Are Scarier Than The Criminals" but in my opinion the police are scarier still and Daystar's twaddle on this forum does little to reassure me in this respect.

Kyu

PS still using Dragon NaturallySpeaking (it's actually rather fun).
Reply
RE: Daystar
(December 15, 2008 at 3:58 pm)Daystar Wrote: I have told you repeatedly that I don't care about proving anything to you. And don't take this personally, but you couldn't debate your own ass out of a wet paper sack.
If you don't care about proving anything why do you mention God and the supernatural? If you are going to bring them up I have the right to ask for proof. If you have a problem with my debating explain what the problem is.
I certainly have a problem with yours! You don't even want a debate! You mention God and the supernatural but you don't want them to be questioned! If I question you for evidence why don't you just say its a matter of "faith" if its a matter of faith. If you DO think you have evidence WHY exactly won't you present any?
You may not want to give evidence but I want to ask for some. I'm an atheist and if you keep on mentioning God on and on; on this atheist forum. I'm going to keep questioning you about it on and on. Seems faith to me.
Reply
RE: Daystar
Daystar how come do you think that the christian god exist but not the Shintoist, or the gods in the Scandinavian religion like Tor, Oden, Frej and so on?

How could yopu prove that they are wrong? What is saying that their exist only one god and not many that people in Hinudism believe. They are one bilion people and it is the oldest religion. They have not been punished by that god you believe in for not believing in him.

The same thing with shintoists, buddhism, konfucism and on. That are alot of people believing in those religion. what is saying that their religion isnt more right then yours?

How would you prove that the hinudism and buddhism idea of recarnation isnt something that doesnt happen? They would probably use the same argument you would. The know its right just because they know it. Sure, it cantbe rpvoen that it happens, but it cant be proven that it doesnt happen.

If the logic is that something can exist just because it cant be proven that it doesnt. Then I would say that we are all living in a world just like in the matrix.

How could I prove that? I cant, but you cant dissprove it. plus I know its right!

Anyway I hope dont have this kind of logic then it would be ridicilious. But if you havent then how can u say that evolution isnt something you belieive in. You make it sound like it is a religion or something.

Do you believe in math or have decided not to, maybe physics is something that is wrong too? Maybe the earth is flat and the sun is orbeting around it? maybe also that if you go far out in sea you will fall over the edge?
*******

Anyway there is somehting that I want to ask you

Do you know what the ten commandments are?

If so, and if you are a strong believer that everything in the bible is correct, then I hope you remember the sabbath and keep it holy. Id didnt know christians had a sabbath.

One more thing I read this thing that came from the bible

You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me.

Third and foruth generations? THat sound a litlte bit harsh doesnt it? And he is jealous god also! Wow, he say that people shouldnt be jealous but he is that himself. isnt that one of the death sins also?

If he would have punish the third and fourht generations of someone who rejects him. Then there wouldnt exist some many chinese people and certinly not so amny vietnamese people either!

Strange that the american soliders in vietname didnt win the war. I mean they where christians. According to this:

but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.

Would they be loved and probably not lose to a bunch of people rejecting him. Sound strange to me, but maybe he loved the vietnamese more then the americans.
Reply
RE: Daystar
Posting these kind of messages when Daystar is not able to answer them is a bit silly imho.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
RE: Daystar
(December 16, 2008 at 7:02 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Posting these kind of messages when Daystar is not able to answer them is a bit silly imho.

Why isn't he able to answer them (aside from the fact that he doesn't really answer anyway)? Does the line through his name mean something?

Kyu
Reply
RE: Daystar
he's banned. Which is a shame really, I really liked him.
Hoi Zaeme.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)