Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 3:59 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
50/50
#21
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 9:08 am)pool Wrote: That would depend on the *puts on sunglasses* type of God you are talking about.

 It doesn't *takes off your sunglasses* really matter.
Reply
#22
RE: 50/50
It *Takes my sunglasses from you and puts it on again* does matter on how you define your God
Reply
#23
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 10:22 am)pool Wrote: It *Takes my sunglasses from you and puts it on again* does matter on how you define your God

If that is the case then *Takes my own sunglasses from my pocket and puts them on* a celestial omnieverything god.
Reply
#24
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 9:51 am)robvalue Wrote: Good point Hedglin.

I always ask the "Everything looks designed" people what a non-designed universe would look like. I never get an answer. Like you say, we have nothing to compare to. People just keep making the fallacy of composition by looking at things inside the universe designed by other things inside the universe and trying to apply that to the universe as a whole.

For the most part, they actually know that they are misusing the scientific principle of uniformitarianism. It only functions inside our universe, and says diddly-squat about other universes or anything outside of our own. It isn't so much that they don't have an answer, because they have one they have already assumed as absolute truth, they just know it isn't convincing to anyone outside their gaggle of the intentionally gullible.
I would more generally advocate that one only leave one entrance into their mind(reason), and keep the rest of it rather closed, as it is one hell of a lot easier to shovel shit in than it is to get it out.

If the evidence and reason for you to believe something isn't really any better than the reason you should believe some rural farmer from Arkansas got anally probed by interstellar visitors, then you probably shouldn't.

Reply
#25
RE: 50/50
*Takes your sunglasses off* 50/50 chance then
Reply
#26
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 10:31 am)pool Wrote: *Takes your sunglasses off* 50/50 chance then

What the fuck!? You are kidding... right?
Reply
#27
RE: 50/50
*gives your sunglasses back* Chill bro
Reply
#28
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 10:34 am)pool Wrote: *gives your sunglasses back* Chill bro

So it was a joke? Please tell me it was a joke.
Reply
#29
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 10:37 am)Shuffle Wrote:
(August 31, 2015 at 10:34 am)pool Wrote: *gives your sunglasses back* Chill bro

So it was a joke? Please tell me it was a joke.

I would imagine an Omnieverything to defy logic as well Rolleyes
Reply
#30
RE: 50/50
(August 31, 2015 at 9:51 am)robvalue Wrote: Good point Hedglin.

I always ask the "Everything looks designed" people what a non-designed universe would look like. I never get an answer. Like you say, we have nothing to compare to. People just keep making the fallacy of composition by looking at things inside the universe designed by other things inside the universe and trying to apply that to the universe as a whole.
The problem with the God thing is that people want the God creature to be all things.  The creator of the universe.  A babbler who spent centuries paling around with a bunch of Middle Eastern goat ropers and homicidal maniacs like Moses.  A zombie who is going to save their worthless souls.  A crazed killed who has a zoo full of weird creatures that they will spend eternity with in some fancy golden cube.  

Frankly I think that they are all bat shit crazy but that's just me.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)