Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:02 am
(January 7, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Pony Wrote: The authorities should shoot these cunts dead already and stop wasting everyone else's time, or if you're for a less extreme option - put a blanket reporting ban on the situation and cut their access to food and water. Simple.
You think the rational and moral thing is for the police to shoot people for potential crimes? What the fuck is the matter with you guys???
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:04 am
(January 8, 2016 at 12:00 am)Pony Wrote: (January 7, 2016 at 11:58 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: As opposed to what? Going in a shooting people for potential violence? Do you guys even hear yourselves?
Excuse me. I exist as well you know, and in fact just a couple of posts above I also suggested that we cut their access to water and food and also place a blanket reporting ban on the situation. They will eventually fuck off themselves without any real force required.
You also said that the cops should just shoot them. A blanket ban on reporting the situation?? Jesus, so now freedom of the press needs to be repressed also?? What the fuck happened to the ACLU branch of the left wing? It's all been replaced by this frightening, authoritarian sponsor of state violence.
Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
85
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:04 am
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2016 at 12:07 am by account_inactive.)
(January 8, 2016 at 12:04 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: You also said that the cops should just shoot them. A blanket ban on reporting the situation?? Jesus, so now freedom of the press needs to be repressed also?? What the fuck happened to the ACLU branch of the left wing? It's all been replaced by this frightening, authoritarian sponsor of state violence.
I support and donate quite a lot to organisations like the ACLU and the EFF actually. It was just a suggestion, probably not the best but as I keep fucking saying - there is a less extreme option there.
Posts: 5436
Threads: 138
Joined: September 6, 2012
Reputation:
58
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:07 am
(January 8, 2016 at 12:04 am)Pony Wrote: (January 8, 2016 at 12:02 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: You think the rational and moral thing is for the police to shoot people for potential crimes? What the fuck is the matter with you guys???
That's what they seem to do with minority suspects, so why the fuck not? And plus you obviously didn't read my less extreme option, did you?
And it is morally wrong when they do it to minorities too! It's wrong then and wrong now. It doesn't change depending on the ideology of the people in question. The police shooting people for potential crimes or violence is wrong. No matter what. I just can't believe how utterly fucked up you guy's morals are on this.
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:07 am
No one wants the cops to shoot them, not seriously. We're just saying that because it's what commonly happens when people pick up guns, occupy a building that belongs to the government (or other people), and then say publicly that they'll shoot any cop that tries to arrest them.
Generally, if you threaten to shoot cops, here, that's your ass. You get shot, instead.
It's not the simple fact that they're carrying guns that is at issue, but how they're using them. They're not just walking around with guns. They're saying, "Here are our guns. If you try to come and take them, we will use them on you."
They have broken the law; they are subject to arrest. They have made it clear that they will resist arrest with lethal violence against police.
What's the fucking question, at this point?
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
85
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:08 am
(January 8, 2016 at 12:07 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: No one wants the cops to shoot them, not seriously. We're just saying that because it's what commonly happens when people pick up guns, occupy a building that belongs to the government (or other people), and then say publicly that they'll shoot any cop that tries to arrest them.
Generally, if you threaten to shoot cops, here, that's your ass. You get shot, instead.
It's not the simple fact that they're carrying guns that is at issue, but how they're using them. They're not just walking around with guns. They're saying, "Here are our guns. If you try to come and take them, we will use them on you."
They have broken the law; they are subject to arrest. They have made it clear that they will resist arrest with lethal violence against police.
What's the fucking question, at this point?
So much this.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:13 am
Perhaps you missed Post #39 in the flurry but in spite of the fact that the cops are not supposed to go in with guns blazing they seem to do it quite often.
If the fuckers resist arrest, particularly if they are pointing guns at the cops, why should the cops not act to protect themselves?
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:18 am
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2016 at 12:19 am by Excited Penguin.)
Quote:I don't consider myself bias towards an American political side but this looks like stereotypical leftwing propaganda.
That's the regressive left for you. Don't expect them to do anything, but to slowly and surely turn over all political influence to the extreme-right.
Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
85
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:20 am
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2016 at 12:21 am by account_inactive.)
Damn EP, maybe shorten the quote next time. That's a large ass block of text. Nevermind, he did it.
(January 8, 2016 at 12:13 am)Minimalist Wrote: Perhaps you missed Post #39 in the flurry but in spite of the fact that the cops are not supposed to go in with guns blazing they seem to do it quite often.
If the fuckers resist arrest, particularly if they are pointing guns at the cops, why should the cops not act to protect themselves?
He seemed to ignore my solution as well. If they resist arrest then I am all for the cops protecting themselves. After all they would do just that if it were a "black militia" (for example) occupying the building.
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: Yup. This is For Certain.
January 8, 2016 at 12:25 am
(January 8, 2016 at 12:20 am)Pony Wrote: Damn EP, maybe shorten the quote next time. That's a large ass block of text. Nevermind, he did it.
(January 8, 2016 at 12:13 am)Minimalist Wrote: Perhaps you missed Post #39 in the flurry but in spite of the fact that the cops are not supposed to go in with guns blazing they seem to do it quite often.
If the fuckers resist arrest, particularly if they are pointing guns at the cops, why should the cops not act to protect themselves?
He seemed to ignore my solution as well. If they resist arrest then I am all for the cops protecting themselves. After all they would do just that if it were a "black militia" (for example) occupying the building.
Complete side-track (thread derail warning!)...
Pony, did you choose your name after the female character in the Robert Salvatore novels?
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
|