Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 8:23 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Quick question about Quarks

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Quick question about Quarks
ReptilianPeon Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Love the religious, hate religion
Posts: 1765
Threads: 225
Joined: February 18, 2015
Reputation: 16
#1
Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 7:23 am
Is is true that only Up and Down Quarks appear in nature? (Those that make up protons and neutrons). I remember hearing this somewhere but I can't remember where. It's bee on my mind recently as I've been thinking about whether it's a good argument to use against religionists.

So my question comes in two parts: Do Strange, Charm, Top and Bottom Quarks appear naturally?

And two: If they don't, could I use this against religionists as an example of something that humans can do but their favourite deity cannot?

Find
Reply
The Valkyrie Offline
The last smile some will see...
*******
Religious Views: Time to end them
Posts: 35323
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation: 146
#2
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 7:26 am
Didn't he own a bar on DS9

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Find
Reply
ReptilianPeon Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Love the religious, hate religion
Posts: 1765
Threads: 225
Joined: February 18, 2015
Reputation: 16
#3
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 7:29 am
Sorry, I don't watch Star Trek so I don't understand.

Find
Reply
StuW Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Depends on how much you piss me off!!
Posts: 647
Threads: 24
Joined: July 28, 2013
Reputation: 14
#4
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 7:31 am (This post was last modified: January 24, 2016 at 7:33 am by StuW.)
Also ran a holographic bar in First Contact as I remember.
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 91
#5
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 11:07 am (This post was last modified: January 24, 2016 at 12:39 pm by Alex K.)
(January 24, 2016 at 7:23 am)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: Is is true that only Up and Down Quarks appear in nature? (Those that make up protons and neutrons). I remember hearing this somewhere but I can't remember where. It's bee on my mind recently as I've been thinking about whether it's a good argument to use against religionists.

So my question comes in two parts: Do Strange, Charm, Top and Bottom Quarks appear naturally?

And two: If they don't, could I use this against religionists as an example of something that humans can do but their favourite deity cannot?

They should all be created all the time in cosmic ray collisions of protons with the atmosphere , which reach almost 50 times the collision energy of the LHC (which is arguably even enough to make the superheavy top quark, although more rarely), but they are all unstable and very quickly decay. Only the proton is by itself a stable combination in which u and d quarks survive very long or indefinitely. Even the neutron is unstable by itself because one of the down quark decays.

Strange and charm quarks regularly appear as virtual particles in protons, depends on whether that counts...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply
Angrboda Offline
Bringer Of Grief
*****
Religious Views: Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You’re my only hope.
Posts: 29802
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation: 159
#6
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 8:57 pm
[Image: quark-01.jpg]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Find
Reply
brewer Offline Donators
Emotionally exhausted/Morally bankrupt
*****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 28406
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation: 90
#7
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 24, 2016 at 9:01 pm
(January 24, 2016 at 7:26 am)Beccs Wrote: Didn't he own a bar on DS9

Do you think he was a top or bottom? I'll give you strange.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 91
#8
RE: Quick question about Quarks
January 25, 2016 at 3:17 am
Ok here's one I made up. You have to know that top quark antiparticles are denoted by a t with a line over it, pronounced "tee bar". So, did you know that t tbar collissions are never topless?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Physical Sciences v
Quick question about Quarks

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  3 Spacecraft Arriving on Mars in Quick Succession Fake Messiah 16 1793 February 18, 2021 at 7:24 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Do All Protons Have the Same Number of Quarks? Rhondazvous 20 4589 October 9, 2017 at 11:55 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Quick Fix to CO2 and oil problems? Fake Messiah 10 2195 September 10, 2015 at 12:13 am
Last Post: thehedglin



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)