Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 16, 2024, 6:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
#61
Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 6:09 pm)Wryetui Wrote:
(May 2, 2016 at 4:52 pm)pocaracas Wrote: ooOOOoooooo Alex, this image is a bit more breathtaking.... but requires some stretch of the imagination.... (and boost it to full size):

You can find it at the wiki page for the solar system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System




I assume that this beautiful image should teach me something, but certainly I have a problem grasping its meaning. Tell me, what is the nature of these beautiful pictures?


Wry,

Are you trying to convince us that you are right? Honestly, why are you here? Please understand that you will likely never persuade an atheist that God exists by using the bible. So...what is your angle here?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#62
Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 4:31 pm)Alex K Wrote: [Image: sdss836dome.jpeg]

Every dot is a galaxy. And this is just our relative cosmic neighborhood.


Holy... *drops*
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#63
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 9:02 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Wry,

Are you trying to convince us that you are right?  Honestly, why are you here?  Please understand that you will likely never persuade an atheist that God exists by using the bible.  So...what is your angle here?

I often wonder why they come here to debate. I mean, as you well know I'm up for a good debate, but why that?

You only ever see them on threads attacking science [Edit to Add: which I find odd, since most of the scientists I've known in my career and personal life have been Christians], telling us false information about ourselves (because their pastors and religious-book writers lied to them, I think, and not because they see themselves as lying), and making terrible and illogical claims that they are so certain are sound that they don't even listen to us explaining why they're leaps of (il)logic.

What I never see is Christians who visit the "shit that happened to me because people are bigoted against atheists" threads, or looking at our talk of personal/life problems, or where we talk about our favorite cars (etc.) for social purposes. That tells me they are not interested in us as people, but as objects-- unfortunately, as objects they can misrepresent in their own minds to justify the way they speak to us, most of the time.

I will give credit where it is due; we have a Muslim and a few Christian posters I've seen really treating us like people, wanting to share in our human experience, and willing to see that while freedom from religion is what makes an atheist, our humanity is otherwise the same as theirs.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
#64
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 8:16 am)robvalue Wrote: Oh, the argument from design again, and the cosmological argument.

These are not evidence, these are arguments in lieu of evidence.

What would a non-designed universe look like, and how do you know this?

How much of the universe would you expect to be lethal to us, if it was designed with us in mind?

The universe "had a cause", why? Because you say so? The cosmological argument is nothing but a bunch of assertions. And calling a cause "God" does not imbue it with intelligence or magic powers; or render it immune to your own premises.

Questions still unanswered, as far as I'm aware.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#65
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 4:31 pm)Alex K Wrote: [Image: sdss836dome.jpeg]

Every dot is a galaxy. And this is just our relative cosmic neighborhood.

Why, there must be hundreds of the darn things. Whodathunkit?
Reply
#66
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 4:31 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
Wryetui Wrote:This is a wrong way of seeing. I have heard the circular argument myself and I find that it gets life from theoligical ignorance. "The Bible" is not a book. It is a collection of writings that was given that name, so "The Bible is not correct because the Bible is so". The revelation of God was given to the prophets and some of them (some by God's command) wrote it, for example, Isaiah. How do I know that God created the world? He revealed it to Moses, and when He came on earth, he didn't disprove Moses's revelation but supported it.

Because it says so in the Bible. How do you know it's true? Because it says so in the Bible.

Been there....heard all this shit before.


[Image: break-the-cycle4.jpg]
Reply
#67
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 6:09 pm)Wryetui Wrote:
(May 2, 2016 at 4:52 pm)pocaracas Wrote: ooOOOoooooo Alex, this image is a bit more breathtaking.... but requires some stretch of the imagination.... (and boost it to full size):

You can find it at the wiki page for the solar system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System




I assume that this beautiful image should teach me something, but certainly I have a problem grasping its meaning. Tell me, what is the nature of these beautiful pictures?

Oh, of course you don't get it, poca accidentally posted the Atheist cosmology picture. How inconsiderate.

Here, the Christian cosmology version should be more readily comprehensible to you:


The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#68
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 4:31 pm)Alex K Wrote: [Image: sdss836dome.jpeg]

Every dot is a galaxy. And this is just our relative cosmic neighborhood.

If you look closely, dim your screen a bit, squint, and load up on cough syrup, you can see, in the upper right quadrant, Jesus riding a camel and wearing a necktie with the slogan, 'Wilt Thou Kiss Me In The Dark, Baby?'

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#69
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 2, 2016 at 11:58 am)Wryetui Wrote: How can you tell me something like that? On what are you based for calling me a "troll"? I was trying to mantian a conversation but if you think you are too good enough for it and that "I must be trolling" is entirely up to you. If you believe you know more about "The Bible" than someone who is studying Theology at college I doubt it. Besides insults and condescendence I have received nothing, the truth keeps being the same, there is no point in having a naturalistic cosmology because it does not make sense, and no one actually has proven me that it does, just speculation and commitment to nothing.

Well, you've received notice that you're a plagiarist and a quote miner, isn't that enough?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#70
RE: Problems understanding naturalistically the beginning of the universe
(May 3, 2016 at 4:22 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(May 2, 2016 at 11:58 am)Wryetui Wrote: How can you tell me something like that? On what are you based for calling me a "troll"? I was trying to mantian a conversation but if you think you are too good enough for it and that "I must be trolling" is entirely up to you. If you believe you know more about "The Bible" than someone who is studying Theology at college I doubt it. Besides insults and condescendence I have received nothing, the truth keeps being the same, there is no point in having a naturalistic cosmology because it does not make sense, and no one actually has proven me that it does, just speculation and commitment to nothing.

Well, you've received notice that you're a plagiarist and a quote miner, isn't that enough?

Boru

and an explanation of current views about early cosmology.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is it possible that the universe could be eternal??... dave4shmups 145 18050 August 9, 2023 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The Universe Is Not Locally Real Foxaèr 52 5812 December 31, 2022 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Infinite Universe? JairCrawford 13 1316 May 4, 2022 at 5:17 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Now we know when the first stars in the universe switched on Foxaèr 1 439 June 28, 2021 at 6:47 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  Another universe existed before ours Foxaèr 27 2825 November 29, 2020 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Watching a show "How The Universe Works" Brian37 13 1957 July 24, 2018 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Inflation without a beginning: a null boundary proposal Jehanne 7 993 May 30, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Total stars in Universe is rougly equal to the total number (ever) of human cells. Jehanne 39 6732 May 24, 2018 at 6:05 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  An infinite, beginningless and eternal Universe is taken seriously by scientists. Jehanne 20 4087 March 18, 2018 at 11:04 am
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  What Does Gravity Have To Do WithThe Expanding Universe? Rhondazvous 42 6453 February 26, 2018 at 8:14 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)