Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 24, 2024, 9:30 am

Poll: If you were were having a baby boy tomorrow, would you opt for him to be circumcised?
This poll is closed.
Yes, hoes
20.00%
11 20.00%
Hellz no
80.00%
44 80.00%
Total 55 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To circumcise or not to circumcise?
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
I havn't seen any men posting saying "I was cut against my will and it was abuse or "I hate my family for it". Both my x's were cut and they never had any issues staying hard or enjoying themselves. Most men who actually got the snip are thankful because its easier to keep clean and more aesthetically pleasing to woman. 

I'm just going by what the snipped say. If stats point to large populations who suffer with feelings of abuse and regret then ill switch my stand, but I dont think they do.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Irrational Wrote:
(June 10, 2016 at 5:37 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: I have seen an uncircumcised penis and I tell you there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it.   They look dirty.  But a circumcised penis is lovely. It's a work of art.

So you've seen one only? The "wrapper" usually goes down or "off" so to speak, when the uncircumcised penis is erect. Perhaps he had phimosis?
I don't know. But it looked like some kind of osis.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.

I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire

Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 5:56 pm)Dust_bunny Wrote: I havn't seen any men posting saying "I was cut against my will and it was abuse or "I hate my family for it". Both my x's were cut and they never had any issues staying hard or enjoying themselves. Most men who actually got the snip are thankful because its easier to keep clean and more aesthetically pleasing to woman. 

I'm just going by what the snipped say. If stats point to large populations who suffer with feelings of abuse and regret then ill switch my stand, but I dont think they do.

You're not looking hard enough. Go frequent some circumcision forums for some examples.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 5:37 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:
(June 10, 2016 at 1:12 pm)Jenny A Wrote: Not.  In my generation most american boys were circumcised (I've never actually seen an uncircumcised penis in the flesh).  Although circumcision was sold to americans as a hygienic measure,  it really has no health benefits. It reduces sensation. It's a painful thing to do to a baby.  I wouldn't do it to any child of mine. In a better world it would be illegal.
I have seen an uncircumcised penis and I tell you there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it.   They look dirty.  But a circumcised penis is lovely. It's a work of art.

Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is like comparing cutting your cuticles to cutting off your finger.  It's an operation, no more barbaric than any other operation.

Lets see... you are wrong here "there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it", this is a personal opinion and not relevant to anyone but you. If you're not smart enough to slide the skin back I wouldn't want you near my penis, if I had one.

And... "They look dirty", no, wrong again, they don't look dirty unless they are dirty and if so you need to suck cock with a better class of men.

And last but not least... "Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is like comparing cutting your cuticles to cutting off your finger." Oopsie! Wrong again, there are a dozen types of female genital mutilations ranging from removing the hood of the clitoris to trimming the labia majora and or the labia minora to a complete removal of both including the clitoris and all it's connected organ as well as sewing up the vagina. Not all are a complete mutilation of every sexual sensory receptors but all are still mutilations and so are male circumcisions. They are all unnecessary operations.

It is barbaric to strap a child down and force a it to have an operation on its perfectly healthy normal body parts for a fashion statement.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 5:57 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:
(June 10, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Irrational Wrote: So you've seen one only? The "wrapper" usually goes down or "off" so to speak, when the uncircumcised penis is erect. Perhaps he had phimosis?
I don't know. But it looked like some kind of osis.

"some kind of osis"....Now that was funny.

I happen to see the beauty in both the Mushroom and the Earthworm, myself.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
Lol you guys are cracking me up.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 5:56 pm)Dust_bunny Wrote: I havn't seen any men posting saying "I was cut against my will and it was abuse or "I hate my family for it". Both my x's were cut and they never had any issues staying hard or enjoying themselves. Most men who actually got the snip are thankful because its easier to keep clean and more aesthetically pleasing to woman. 

I'm just going by what the snipped say. If stats point to large populations who suffer with feelings of abuse and regret then ill switch my stand, but I dont think they do.

It might be more pleasing to you but please don't broad bush all women with your preferences. Many women love the look and feel of an uncut penis. And there are many men who are unhappy about it. There is also a movement to change the laws about circumcision in many states and nation wide and a majority of them are men.
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 6:08 pm)Thena323 Wrote:
(June 10, 2016 at 5:57 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: I don't know. But it looked like some kind of osis.

"some kind of osis"....Now that was funny.

I happen to see the beauty in both the Mushroom and the Earthworm, myself.

haha the earthworm makes it sound worse.

Mine is uncircumcised and I think it looks uglier than it would circumcised when not in use.  When it's in use and erect then it's fine, pretty good in fact, there's an example of it in area 69.  It basically looks circumcised I think.   To me I'd say it's more like futuristic spaceship vs some weird drooping mouthed creature.  I could understand why girls would like the spaceship better.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
(June 10, 2016 at 2:18 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I wish I had been circumcised and I do still consider getting it done now but my motivation to do it is pretty low, I'd have to go out of my way, research it, pay for it, so on and so forth.

When I'm erect my foreskin isn't noticeable so doesn't bother me it's just when it's soft i think it's longer than average slightly so I don't like the way it looks so in that aspect I wish I'd been circumcised and I'd therefore I'd consider my son being circumcised.

Although I have a daughter not a son, plus I live in England so I admit i don't have full knowledge of the implications of the medical procedure or how it works, it's just a case of I would choose for my son to have less of a prominent foreskin than me and if the surgical procedure is relatively cheap and harmless is get it done, I don't see why not.

I'd advise against it. Absolutely advise against it if it's just for cosmetic reasons, but hey. Your body your decision. Although I do think that there are merely cosmetic circumcisions where much of the foreskin isn't removed and the frenulum and such are still left. Also it's normal for it to have an overhang, no foreskin is the exact same, and when you're having sex you're not soft while doing it, I hope? :p
Reply
RE: To circumcise or not to circumcise?
I don't really have a preference as far as sex goes. Cut? Uncut? Doesn't matter to me. Even if I did have a preference though, I certainly would never force my preference upon my son (i only have daughters). Nor would I allow my husband to force his preference on our son. If a man wants to be circumcised, then he can get the procedure done when he's an adult. That way it's his choice. I mean it IS his penis. If it's really so painful that they might not want to do it as an adult, then why would I ever force it upon an infant who has no way of telling you how much he's in pain?

Honestly it's not okay to do this to men because some women think it looks better. You wouldn't give your daughter breast implants against her will would you?
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)