christian school project

[brewer]

JFC Ark. I think you need to stick to cutting trees, reducing your serotonin levels by colon cleansing, and as said before, start your own religion. 

By today's standards, you have a major fantasy delusion. Seek the cure!

By today's standards I have simply quantized an infinite field by it's own relativistic existence through Newtonian equal/opposite reaction and conservation of energy.

You're just mad I used the word God in there somewhere.

bold mine

I think you mean angry. Mad, in the most unstable application, applies to you.

[Mister Agenda]

It could still exist despite not having a logical definition, if it did, it would just be ill-defined and the reasons given for its existence would not pertain to its actual existence.

I like that answer, but you still haven't defined God.

Why would it be my job to define it?

[Mister Agenda]

You are not telling me anything here, you may have well said, "God is nice." Or "God never says shit".  I'm asking you, what the fuck is God? An alien?  A really big turtle that spans the universe? A Robot? That's the problem with Christians, they don't really know what the Hell they are worshipping.  They hide behind the God is Love, God is Pure bullshit.

Do you want the correct answer?  Maybe the school kid or what I believe to be a troll wants to have a dig first?

God is a noun: a person, place and thing. To us it is mostly place and thing. During inflation it spreads out and becomes the border conditions and shaping functions for the universes.

If God is not a person, it's 'existence' is mere semantics of the 'I say potato, you say potahto variety'.

[Mister Agenda]

On second thoughts, I'm changing thingy to NOTHING

So in your model, nothing did something?

What is the property that nothingness has that prevents it from doing something?

[Arkilogue]

God is a noun: a person, place and thing. To us it is mostly place and thing. During inflation it spreads out and becomes the border conditions and shaping functions for the universes.

If God is not a person, it's 'existence' is mere semantics of the 'I say potato, you say potahto variety'.

Even if God is a person, it would be inexperiencable by our efforts. Just like I can never truly know and experience your subjective state. It would have to be an act of God.

[Arkilogue]

So in your model, nothing did something?

What is the property that nothingness has that prevents it from doing something?

The the property of absence....which is to say the absence of properties. "No ting fo do work."

[Mister Agenda]

What is the property that nothingness has that prevents it from doing something?

The the property of absence....which is to say the absence of properties. "No ting fo do work."

Not being able to do work is a property. How do you justify assigning it?

Perhaps absolute nothingness is an untenable situation that instantly converts into something. Can you rebut that proposition with something that doesn't amount to 'because I define nothingness as not being able to do that'?