Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:07 am
(November 4, 2016 at 4:51 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: (November 4, 2016 at 4:23 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
It is statistically likely that I loose as time diverges. I have lost, and won.
Wow. That's really deep.
How do you "loose"? what have you loosened? is it a sphincter?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:10 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 5:11 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Perhaps this escaped you, since you keep harping on about how we'll be able to make a better box soon.....but no one is disputing that.
One wonders how the acknowledgement of advancing computational architectures..combined with a bit of fuzzy thinking about simulations, is evidence of a god. Now, I'm sure that it would be easy to say "well, I've defined gods as such and such", but seeing as how any schmoe with a dick already fits your description of a "god"... the entire bit...text baiting and all, collapses into inanity.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:38 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 5:40 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
My eyes ... my poor eyes ....
Have trouble reading that but I did skim through it and saw something about Kurzweil. Don't listen to anything that man says.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:49 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 5:51 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 4, 2016 at 5:07 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: (November 4, 2016 at 4:51 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Wow. That's really deep.
How do you "loose"? what have you loosened? is it a sphincter?
Indeed, that is an error.
Correction is indeed 'lose'.
(November 4, 2016 at 5:38 am)Mathilda Wrote: My eyes ... my poor eyes ....
Have trouble reading that but I did skim through it and saw something about Kurzweil. Don't listen to anything that man says.
Kurzweil is quite the inventor.
Albeit, unless one is brain damaged, technological exponential transition is observable, as his graphs entail.
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:57 am
(November 4, 2016 at 5:49 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (November 4, 2016 at 5:07 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: How do you "loose"? what have you loosened? is it a sphincter?
Indeed, that is an error.
Correction is indeed 'lose'.
Or is the correction win?
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:57 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 5:58 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 4, 2016 at 5:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: Perhaps this escaped you, since you keep harping on about how we'll be able to make a better box soon.....but no one is disputing that.
One wonders how the acknowledgement of advancing computational architectures..combined with a bit of fuzzy thinking about simulations, is evidence of a god. Now, I'm sure that it would be easy to say "well, I've defined gods as such and such", but seeing as how any schmoe with a dick already fits your description of a "god"... the entire bit...text baiting and all, collapses into inanity.
I haven't any description.
It is rather that, on observation of statistics, God is describable as an entity with the ability to generate non-trivial artificial intellect, that exceeds the net intelligence of its species.
A particular property of the theistic God is the ability to generate non-trivial, human level intellect (where other properties are likely nonsense)
Both females and males do machine learning work, therein mankind is likely god-bound. (man/woman, rather than solely males, are thereafter likely god-bound; as observed in the original, unedited post).
Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 6:00 am
You immediately contradicted yourself in the response above. Glitch in the hardware?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 6:02 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 6:06 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 4, 2016 at 5:57 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: (November 4, 2016 at 5:49 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Indeed, that is an error.
Correction is indeed 'lose'.
Or is the correction win?
Both.
The correction is:
It is statistically likely that I lose as time diverges.
and or
It is statistically likely that I win as time diverges.
...as statistically, humans are subject to win and or lose.
(November 4, 2016 at 6:00 am)Rhythm Wrote: You immediately contradicted yourself in the response above. Glitch in the hardware? Where is the contradiction?
I shall attain some sleep.
Thus far, the most intelligent response amidst this crowd, has been a spelling error indication, betwixt a trivial sentence of mine.
Until 9 hours from now...
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 6:32 am
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 6:53 am
What the fuck is a "probable non-omniscient god"?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
|