Access to the POTUS is a privilege, not a right. As far as I can tell, the NYT and CNN are still free to print and broadcast whatever they want.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 9:01 am
Thread Rating:
New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing
|
RE: New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing
February 24, 2017 at 6:41 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 6:44 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Count on the contemptible Christian buffoon to come to the defense of a despicable would be tyrant.
(February 24, 2017 at 6:40 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Access to the POTUS is a privilege, not a right. As far as I can tell, the NYT and CNN are still free to print and broadcast whatever they want. Don't pretend you don't understand the game this administration is playing. You're too bright for that, and disingenuousness doesn't suit you. RE: New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing
February 24, 2017 at 6:49 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 6:51 pm by Anomalocaris.)
RE: New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing
February 24, 2017 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 6:56 pm by Amarok.)
(February 24, 2017 at 6:40 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Access to the POTUS is a privilege, not a right. As far as I can tell, the NYT and CNN are still free to print and broadcast whatever they want. Please don't insult our intelligence. This is an attempt to shield Trumps regime from criticism and you would be screaming bloody murder if Obama had done this
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb (February 24, 2017 at 6:46 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(February 24, 2017 at 6:40 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Access to the POTUS is a privilege, not a right. As far as I can tell, the NYT and CNN are still free to print and broadcast whatever they want. Perhaps. Are they being treated unfairly? That's obviously a matter of opinion. I personally feel that the MSM have been irresponsible for years. I do not think they intentionally fabricated news, except in isolated cases like what Dan Rather did, but I do think the reporting has been highly selective. Nevertheless it is simply incorrect to say the Trump is trampling on the First Amendment. No one is being censored. The everyday blogger cannot just waltz into a presidential press conference so why should openly hostile news organizations be able to. (February 24, 2017 at 6:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(February 24, 2017 at 6:46 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Don't pretend you don't understand the game this administration is playing. You're too bright for that, and disingenuousness doesn't suit you. I guess Obama should have barred Fox when he was in office. That would have went over well
Our first kindergarten President is showing his stuff.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)