Play "Cards Against Atheist Forums" online now!
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 28th May 2017, 16:18

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
#21
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 16:30)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: There were other species of humans besides H. Sapiens, and, indeed, the article references two of them.

Your reply is rendered a red herring at this point.

Oh, Hugster doesn't want to hear that.  His stupid fucking bible makes no such claim and you know how he is with the stupid fucking bible.


Reply
#22
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 17:20)Grandizer Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 16:35)Huggy74 Wrote: Invoking Adam and Eve kind of implies that were speaking of what's classified as modern humans.

Sorry, but even I knew this wasn't about homo sapiens. Regardless, you should've done a bit of research before you decided to submit that post.

Then whats the freakin point? Why not discuss dinosaurs if you're point is that the earth is older than the perceived biblical timeline?
Reply
#23
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 17:27)Huggy74 Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 17:20)Grandizer Wrote: Sorry, but even I knew this wasn't about homo sapiens. Regardless, you should've done a bit of research before you decided to submit that post.

Then whats the freakin point? Why not discuss dinosaurs if you're point is that the earth is older than the perceived biblical timeline?

I honestly don't know the point. Perhaps Minimalist can answer that. But what I do find interesting is that you seem to equate only the modern humans to the biblical humans who descended from Adam and Eve. Are you implying the older human species weren't human?
Reply
#24
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
Quote:Invoking Adam and Eve kind of implies that were speaking of what's classified as modern humans.

Um, invoking 'Adam and Eve' implies that I was making fun of your childish beliefs.


Reply
#25
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 17:35)Grandizer Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 17:27)Huggy74 Wrote: Then whats the freakin point? Why not discuss dinosaurs if you're point is that the earth is older than the perceived biblical timeline?

I honestly don't know the point. Perhaps Minimalist can answer that. But what I do find interesting is that you seem to equate only the modern humans to the biblical humans who descended from Adam and Eve. Are you implying the older human species weren't human?

There was at least one humanoid species mentioned in the bible that predated Adam and Eve. There is already a whole discussion on that subject.

As far as how old the earth is, the Bible makes no mention of that.
Reply
#26
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
Huggy, I think it was obvious to everyone but you that he was using sarcastic humor. Perhaps you're having trouble with the joke because you're importing your own assumptions?

If you don't like his thread-title, report it. I'm told that once upon a time the Staff would change misleading titles. Perhaps it'll work even now?
On goal, baby.
Reply
#27
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 17:27)Huggy74 Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 17:20)Grandizer Wrote: Sorry, but even I knew this wasn't about homo sapiens. Regardless, you should've done a bit of research before you decided to submit that post.

Then whats the freakin point? Why not discuss dinosaurs if you're point is that the earth is older than the perceived biblical timeline?

Basically because your outdated perspective deserves to be ignored.
Reply
#28
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
hmm . . . .


perceived Biblical timeline vs. the Hubble Deep Field images . . . .

"Your wife don't suck your dick like that does she?"



"Yeah, she does, and she gets it all over her fucking face. That's about a hundred dollar load, bud ."
























Reply
#29
RE: This Leaves Adam And Eve on The Outside Looking In
(29th April 2017, 17:47)Huggy74 Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 17:35)Grandizer Wrote: I honestly don't know the point. Perhaps Minimalist can answer that. But what I do find interesting is that you seem to equate only the modern humans to the biblical humans who descended from Adam and Eve. Are you implying the older human species weren't human?

There was at least one humanoid species mentioned in the bible that predated Adam and Eve. There is already a whole discussion on that subject.

As far as how old the earth is, the Bible makes no mention of that.

Fair enough. Not a traditional interpretation, but I get where you're coming from here now.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Keep Looking Down, Israelis Minimalist 7 699 16th March 2016, 14:55
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Scientific Adam and Eve Won2blv 52 5169 22nd June 2015, 10:57
Last Post: Pandæmonium
  "Time does not exist outside of the universe, so nothing can predate the universe." IanHulett 18 3711 22nd February 2015, 12:20
Last Post: ReptilianPeon
  What's outside? lifesagift 30 2415 7th September 2014, 17:10
Last Post: Tobie
  Idaho Looking To Cash In On Stupid Minimalist 13 1044 18th June 2014, 23:41
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  NASA Study Concludes When Civilization Will End, And It's Not Looking Good for Us Gooders1002 9 2280 22nd March 2014, 14:20
Last Post: Heywood
  Adam & Eve - The first cavemen frogger6 5 1767 27th September 2012, 14:11
Last Post: Minimalist
  Looking for a study MysticKnight 4 1339 21st September 2012, 16:43
Last Post: MysticKnight



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)