The Biological Jew

[Alex K]

Knowing Harris, he will claim all atheists are secretely jews and under the command of the Elders of Zion, whatever the fuck that means.

I think he has already done exactly that not too long ago.

[LastPoet]

Harris posts his exclusively Anti-Semitic rage rants, because he can.

Apparently, unadulterated demagoguery isn't considered as distasteful or "negative" as oh, say.... click-bait.

I assume that's a criticism of the mod practises and rules of the forum, and I feel compelled to respond to that. As a German, I am extremely appalled and offended by Harris' antisemitic hate. So much so that I'd like to see him thrown off the forum better yesterday than today. I'm motivated to consider whether his continous hate posting is actionable since that's all he seems to do. However, the free expression of opinons is a very important principle of this forum, and I find ridicule and counter arguments to be more effective than undermining free speech because of some idiot Nazi, as long as these things are isolated and the forum isn't taking a wrong turn as a whole. The clickbait thing on the other hand was an idea to make to forum more readable, i.e. to improve forum functionality - two completely different issues. If you frame it as if click-bait titles had been made against the rule because they are offensive, thus insinuating that the staff finds hat speech less offensive , that's just dishonest.

It comes with the job Alex. Can't please everyone

[Alex K]

I assume that's a criticism of the mod practises and rules of the forum, and I feel compelled to respond to that. As a German, I am extremely appalled and offended by Harris' antisemitic hate. So much so that I'd like to see him thrown off the forum better yesterday than today. I'm motivated to consider whether his continous hate posting is actionable since that's all he seems to do. However, the free expression of opinons is a very important principle of this forum, and I find ridicule and counter arguments to be more effective than undermining free speech because of some idiot Nazi, as long as these things are isolated and the forum isn't taking a wrong turn as a whole. The clickbait thing on the other hand was an idea to make to forum more readable, i.e. to improve forum functionality - two completely different issues. If you frame it as if click-bait titles had been made against the rule because they are offensive, thus insinuating that the staff finds hat speech less offensive , that's just dishonest.

It comes with the job Alex. Can't please everyone

And if in doubt, we usually choose to please the Nazis, amirite?

[Edwardo Piet]

I only see one parasite here, and it's eaten Harris' brain.

You see the parasite? Like literally?

Has it eaten through his brain so much it's made a whole in his head and it's snarling at you and shouting in parasite language "I'm STARVINGGGGGG! This thing wasn't much of a meal! I've had a better meal from a pigeon!"?

[Alex K]

I only see one parasite here, and it's eaten Harris' brain.

You see the parasite? Like literally?

Has it eaten through his brain so much it's made a whole in his head and it's snarling at you and shouting in parasite language "I'm STARVINGGGGGG! This thing wasn't much of a meal! I've had a better meal from a pigeon!"?

Yes, it's a meme parasite, and it's showing its tentacles.

[Edwardo Piet]

I bet it would make a much better party guest than Harris would.

[Athene]

Harris posts his exclusively Anti-Semitic rage rants, because he can.

Apparently, unadulterated demagoguery isn't considered as distasteful or "negative" as oh, say.... click-bait.

I assume that's a criticism of the mod practises and rules of the forum, and I feel compelled to respond to that. As a German, I am extremely appalled and offended by Harris' antisemitic hate. So much so that I'd like to see him thrown off the forum better yesterday than today. I'm motivated to consider whether his continous hate posting is actionable since that's all he seems to do. However, the free expression of opinons is a very important principle of this forum, and I find ridicule and counter arguments to be more effective than undermining free speech because of some idiot Nazi, as long as these things are isolated and the forum isn't taking a wrong turn as a whole. The clickbait thing on the other hand was an idea to make to forum more readable, i.e. to improve forum functionality - two completely different issues. If you frame it as if click-bait titles had been made against the rule because they are offensive, thus insinuating that the staff finds hate speech of this type less offensive, that's just dishonest and almost slanderous.

I'm being slanderous? lol...Okay, Alek.
I'm the villain, now. Sure.

You folks can certainly operate this forum as you deem fit, and employ any standards you wish; It's not my forum.
But, I am free to express that some of the standards SUCK.

[Alex K]

I'm being slanderous? lol...Okay, Alek.
I'm the villain, now. Sure.

You folks can certainly operate this forum as you deem fit, and employ any standards you wish; It's not my forum.
But, I am free to express that some of the standards SUCK.

No, you're not the villain. Duh.

And feel free to complain that hat speech isn't banned, but don't imply that the staff finds click bait more offensive than Nazis, or you've lost me.

[LastPoet]

I'm being slanderous? lol...Okay, Alek.
I'm the villain, now. Sure.

You folks can certainly operate this forum as you deem fit, and employ any standards you wish; It's not my forum.
But, I am free to express that some of the standards SUCK.

Nobody said you are a villain. It is just that you are being unjust to the work we try to do. We removed the clickbait rule as we humans find ourselves in error.

We can operate the forum as per our rules. If you can find a way for us to act within them, report that post or user and we then can analise it.

If we were to act on a member because another member feels the other should be banned, we would be out of users real fast.

Those standards inplace here, deemed to "suck" as you deemed, are much to everyone protection against personal feelings. I find Harris speech downright abhorrent. From there to act because of a personal opinion goes a long way.

But thank you for your vote of confidence

[Athene]

I'm being slanderous? lol...Okay, Alek.
I'm the villain, now. Sure.

You folks can certainly operate this forum as you deem fit, and employ any standards you wish; It's not my forum.
But, I am free to express that some of the standards SUCK.

No, you're not the villain. Duh.

And feel free to complain that hat speech isn't banned, but don't imply that the staff finds click bait more offensive than Nazis, or you've lost me.

It would seem to me that Harris could very well banned under the existing trolling and/or spamming rules. He barely engages in these threads beyond the OP.
Call me crazy....but it seems as though his sole and express purpose is to inflame and incite, not discuss.

Others have been banned for the same or even less, I'd wager.

Do (or don't do) what you will, though. Like I said; Not my forum.