Posts: 882
Threads: 6
Joined: November 14, 2014
Reputation:
26
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2017 at 3:12 pm by JackRussell.)
Kent Hovind believes the world is 6-10,00 years old. Derp.
Kent Hovind believes a global flood happened. derp.
Kent Hovind doesn't understand why monkeys can co-exist with Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Derp.
Kent Hovind can't fill out a simple tax return.
Eric Hovind, son of the devil!!!, is in bed with pre-supp tosser Sye-Ten, now this is evolution, but the evolution of BS. I think even Eric realises his Dad's BS is flawed, so he is now going down the pre-sup path that we ALL know that god is really, really real and OMG it's the Xtian god, and the particular god they believe in. BURP.
I think they are just boring dicks who should be encouraged strongly not to be breed, coz, well, lunatics.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 3:34 pm
He's really got a stick up his arse about tax dollars being used to teach the "religion" of evolution in public schools, which is astonishingly and egregiously ironic.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 3:48 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2017 at 3:49 pm by vorlon13.)
In the 40s and 50s his take on relativity would have been seen as blasphemy by the hawks of the time. Raising doubt, however specious, about the rapidly developing nuclear technology and it's potency against our perceived implacable enemies just would not have happened.
And he would have been laughed out of his pulpit had he persisted as ever larger nukes were tested weekly. Each one a clear demonstration of God's Holy Truth of E = MC^2.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 2435
Threads: 21
Joined: May 5, 2017
Reputation:
26
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 4:23 pm
Kent Hovind is beyond parody, he's a shill in the pay of Dawkins. I mean he has to be.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
Posts: 882
Threads: 6
Joined: November 14, 2014
Reputation:
26
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 4:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2017 at 4:29 pm by JackRussell.)
(July 3, 2017 at 4:23 pm)Succubus Wrote: Kent Hovind is beyond parody, he's a shill in the pay of Dawkins. I mean he has to be.
So True, our one and only Pope Dawkins has beatified proto-Saint Hovind that we may learn:
Creationist are really, really daft buggers.
I would say cunts, but that's just rude.
(sorry)
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 3, 2017 at 4:41 pm
Not rude; merely attributing a use to them that they don't deserve.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 2013
Threads: 28
Joined: January 1, 2017
Reputation:
15
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 4, 2017 at 11:35 am
(July 3, 2017 at 4:23 pm)Succubus Wrote: Kent Hovind is beyond parody, he's a shill in the pay of Dawkins. I mean he has to be.
His son Eric seems embarrassingly to have not only not fallen far from the tree, but his apple was impaled by his father's branch.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Posts: 30591
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 4, 2017 at 11:52 am
(July 3, 2017 at 2:43 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: (June 17, 2017 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Hey this looks like a good time to break out Hovind's "doctoral" "thesis".
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind...sertations
(Link to the thesis in the rationalwiki page.)
Don't read it! Really! Don't read it! I made that mistake and my brain cells started screaming and dying. I'll never get those IQ points back.
I thouught any "Doctoral Thesis" would present facts and some intelligent conclusions. Wow, was I ever wrong.
Any "thesis" that opens with "Hello, my name is.." should be read solely for the facepalming lulz, particularly when what follows is "Kent Hovind".
Posts: 2013
Threads: 28
Joined: January 1, 2017
Reputation:
15
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 4, 2017 at 8:27 pm
(July 4, 2017 at 11:52 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (July 3, 2017 at 2:43 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Don't read it! Really! Don't read it! I made that mistake and my brain cells started screaming and dying. I'll never get those IQ points back.
I thouught any "Doctoral Thesis" would present facts and some intelligent conclusions. Wow, was I ever wrong.
Any "thesis" that opens with "Hello, my name is.." should be read solely for the facepalming lulz, particularly when what follows is "Kent Hovind".
That they're majoring in theology or some other such nonsense means they're likely getting the degree from some worthless diploma mill that probably doesn't even have an accreditation, if they even bother going through any kind of actual school building and not just some online speed-through course catalogue. I don't care if they get a Ph.D in theology from fucking Harvard, they're not a goddamn doctor.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Posts: 381
Threads: 114
Joined: November 10, 2015
Reputation:
6
RE: Kent Hovind denies Relativity
July 5, 2017 at 12:37 am
(July 4, 2017 at 8:27 pm)Astonished Wrote: (July 4, 2017 at 11:52 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Any "thesis" that opens with "Hello, my name is.." should be read solely for the facepalming lulz, particularly when what follows is "Kent Hovind".
That they're majoring in theology or some other such nonsense means they're likely getting the degree from some worthless diploma mill that probably doesn't even have an accreditation, if they even bother going through any kind of actual school building and not just some online speed-through course catalogue. I don't care if they get a Ph.D in theology from fucking Harvard, they're not a goddamn doctor.
Hovind got his "degree" from Patriot University. This tiny little building out in the middle of bumfuck nowhere.
|
