Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 7:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Schrodinger versus Dirac equation.
#1
The Schrodinger versus Dirac equation.
Question is mainly for Alex, but others can jump in, also!

Is there a problem that can be solved with the Schrodinger equation that cannot be solved with the Dirac equation, or the latter is far too complex to do so?  Interesting derivation of the Dirac equation here, by the way:



Reply
#2
RE: The Schrodinger versus Dirac equation.
I haven't dealt much with the Dirac equation as a relativistic wave equation. It is very useful, but kind of awkward in that role. Where the Dirac equation really shines is as an element of quantum field theories such as Quantum Electrodynamics and the Standard Model, where it serves not as a quantum wave function equation for a fixed number of particles, but one level deeper, as a field equation where it describes the creation, annihilation and interaction of arbitrary numbers of particles including virtual ones.

Technically, the Dirac equation as a wave equation can be taken to its non-relativistic limit where it yields the Schrödinger equation (or rather the Pauli equation which is an extension incorporating spin) plus several approximate corrections which can be used to improve atomic physics calculations (see: Foldy-Wouthuysen-Transformation). So in principle, the Dirac equation can do anything the simple Schrödinger equation can because it contains it as a limit, but in practise, as you say, if only approximations to relativity theory are good enough, many calculations are way simpler using the Schrödinger or if necessary, the Pauli equation.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#3
RE: The Schrodinger versus Dirac equation.
(July 28, 2017 at 8:14 pm)Alex K Wrote: I haven't dealt much with the Dirac equation as a relativistic wave equation. It is very useful, but kind of awkward in that role. Where the Dirac equation really shines is as an element of quantum field theories such as Quantum Electrodynamics and the Standard Model, where it serves not as a quantum wave function equation for a fixed number of particles, but one level deeper, as a field equation where it describes the creation, annihilation and interaction of arbitrary numbers of particles including virtual ones.

Technically, the Dirac equation as a wave equation can be taken to its non-relativistic limit where it yields the Schrödinger equation (or rather the Pauli equation which is an extension incorporating spin) plus several approximate corrections which can be used to improve atomic physics calculations (see: Foldy-Wouthuysen-Transformation). So in principle, the Dirac equation can do anything the simple Schrödinger equation can because it contains it as a limit, but in practise, as you say, if only approximations to relativity theory are good enough, many calculations are way simpler using the Schrödinger or if necessary, the Pauli equation.

You're up early, Alex!
Reply
#4
RE: The Schrodinger versus Dirac equation.
(July 28, 2017 at 10:03 pm)Jehanne Wrote: You're up early, Alex!

2:30 am still counts as up late Smile
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sean Carroll's everyday equation. Jehanne 38 2883 July 24, 2016 at 5:27 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning TubbyTubby 8 2349 March 3, 2016 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Einstein's Derivation of the Famous Equation, E=mc2 little_monkey 0 927 June 1, 2013 at 4:50 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)