The theory of evolution HOAX

[Edwardo Piet]

Creationists are fucking shit.

Dirty bastards.

[notimportant1234]

Not the case. Never felt smarter than other people.

You can't judge that from the forum.

And yet you seem to think that your shallow understanding is both significant and the result of "easily understanding".

Your words mean things.  I guess that's something else you have a shallow understand of.

Never sayed it was significant.

---

No evidence to disprove it either . This problem is uncertain and out of our reach for now.

Fine, so we can safely ignore it until evidence that supports its existence appears.

That is a matter of choice , I don't know from where do you get the impresion that I tryed to convince anything

---

What's the term for when you ask someone to actually learn something about a topic, like evolution, before spouting off about it?

Never sayed I didn't believe the theory of evolution.

---

True,

I have a masters in archaeology.

But, because i care about the truth, i read the works of experts in other fields.

I may not be at their level, but I have a grounding in assessing their claims.

In my field I have numpties talking about ancient astronaut theories.

I am not a biologist but have spent nearly 30 years learning about evolution.

I know when and why some types of people lie.

I understand why you sayed to make another thread. 😂

[Succubus]

Never sayed it was significant.

---

Never sayed I didn't believe the theory of evolution.

---

I understand why you sayed to make another thread. 😂

Do you not wonder why sayed has a squiggly red line beneath it when you type it out?

[notimportant1234]

Forggot that say was an irregular verb.

[Succubus]

Forggot that say was an irregular verb.

There's fuck all irregular about using the fucking spell checker!!!!

Edit, for added rage.

[Cyberman]

Fine, so we can safely ignore it until evidence that supports its existence appears.

That is a matter of choice , I don't know from where do you get the impresion that I tryed to convince anything

No, it's a matter of basic logic. Without any evidence to support the existence of something, how can we even know about it?

Further, until we get such evidence, we are perfectly justified in withholding belief in its existence. You seem to think that the burden of proof is something optional. Demonstrate that there's a 'there' there before we even think about discussing anything about it.

[Harry Nevis]

It means that they speak of the same God.

Who told you that?

---

This is not worth the time it's taking me to type this post.  More vague handwaving woo.  Trying to get you to give some concrete, specific details is like trying to grab a handful of air.  I'm out.

Well I came to the conclusion that religions are talking about the same thing because they look the same from the surface , before you dig into them .
I can't give you an answer better than that because I'm not very documented about religions , I just have a general knowledge.

---

The problem in our debate is that you think I'm trying to prove religions and God to you , when actually I just try to get something good out of religion.
And for God , I already sayed , logic is a limited tool and can't solve the problem of God alone . You need a sync of logic and imagination , but that may not work because we don't have that much knowledge yet.

So you're just throwing out statements as facts without knowing what you're talking about.

[SteelCurtain]

Forggot that say was an irregular verb.

There's fuck all irregular about using the fucking spell checker!!!!

Edit, for added rage.

How about chill the fuck out, the guy's not a native English speaker. He's doing fine, you know what he means.

Jaysus sometimes you make threads unbearable.

[Succubus]

How about chill the fuck out, the guy's not a native English speaker. He's doing fine, you know what he means.

Jaysus sometimes you make threads unbearable.

That bad huh?

[Cyberman]

Well, I've not seen a single bear around here lately, so yeah, probably.