Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 10:52 am
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 10:53 am by Catholic_Lady.)
(August 30, 2017 at 10:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 10:08 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You claimed the law only favors Christianity.
Not just Islam either. Native American' are exempt from certain drug prohibitions. Conscientious objectors do not have to serve militarily, regardless of faith or lack thereof. Sacramental wine was exempt during prohibition. Obscenity laws are not specific to any religious traditions. Anything he can imagine would apply equally to orthodox Jews. For some reason I think this has to do with wedding cakes.
Yep, thought so. Kinda dumb when someone says the law only favors christianity.
But then again, this is the same person who claims it is scientific fact that a human fetus is a parasite.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 947
Threads: 0
Joined: May 12, 2016
Reputation:
11
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 11:34 am by Harry Nevis.)
(August 30, 2017 at 10:05 am)alpha male Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 7:42 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: I"ll shut up when you stop proposing laws to favor your fairy tale.
Posting on an atheist forum has no effect on proposed laws.
Sure it does. You just can't tell from inside your christer-bubble.
(August 30, 2017 at 10:05 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 8:45 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: Pick any state that has passed or proposed a Religious Freedom Act. It's really not about favoring religion, though. They only favor christianity.
I'm playing along, as I can't believe you're so deep in your bubble that you don't know of these things.
Are you saying that Christians should only be allowed to practice their religion in private? You do realize that the freedom of conscience and the free exercise of religion is a protected human right subject only to a compelling state interest, which is a very high standard. Or have you stopped believing in human rights? Or maybe you think some human rights are more equal than others.
Or maybe you're just so blind that you can't see the problem. Practicing your religion should not include pushing it on other people, or making them pay for your fantasy. And your rant about human rights is ludicrous. Jump to ridiculous conclusions much?
(August 30, 2017 at 10:08 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 9:55 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: I couldn't say. But here in the US, exercising that right could be dangerous.
You claimed the law only favors Christianity.
They do. The authors of the bill in Indiana said as much. A muslim claiming religious freedom is just a potential terrorist in their eyes. The only religious freedom that these christians want is to do whatever they want and say its part of their practice. Of course, all other religions don't count, because they're obviously false.
(August 30, 2017 at 10:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 10:16 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Not just Islam either. Native American' are exempt from certain drug prohibitions. Conscientious objectors do not have to serve militarily, regardless of faith or lack thereof. Sacramental wine was exempt during prohibition. Obscenity laws are not specific to any religious traditions. Anything he can imagine would apply equally to orthodox Jews. For some reason I think this has to do with wedding cakes.
Yep, thought so. Kinda dumb when someone says the law only favors christianity.
But then again, this is the same person who claims it is scientific fact that a human fetus is a parasite.
I'm talking about the recent plague of laws being enacted.
And all it takes is to look up the definition of parasite to show I'm right.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 12:48 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 12:49 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: ...you're just so blind that you can't see the problem. Practicing your religion should not include pushing it on other people, or making them pay for your fantasy....I'm talking about the recent plague of laws being enacted.
Specifics please and also try to explain how they favor only Christians.
(August 30, 2017 at 10:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: ...But then again, this is the same person who claims it is scientific fact that a human fetus is a parasite.
(August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: And all it takes is to look up the definition of parasite to show I'm right.
WebMD seems to consider it a baby right from the start. Fetal Development Slide Show Apparently you know something the experts don't. (doubt it, though)
Posts: 947
Threads: 0
Joined: May 12, 2016
Reputation:
11
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 1:00 pm
(August 30, 2017 at 12:48 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: ...you're just so blind that you can't see the problem. Practicing your religion should not include pushing it on other people, or making them pay for your fantasy....I'm talking about the recent plague of laws being enacted.
Specifics please and also try to explain how they favor only Christians.
(August 30, 2017 at 10:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: ...But then again, this is the same person who claims it is scientific fact that a human fetus is a parasite.
(August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: And all it takes is to look up the definition of parasite to show I'm right.
WebMD seems to consider it a baby right from the start. Fetal Development Slide Show Apparently you know something the experts don't. (doubt it, though)
Do your own homework. It's not like it'll make any difference to you.
So, it's a baby parasite. Did they say I was wrong?
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 1:21 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2017 at 1:24 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(August 30, 2017 at 12:48 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: (August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: ...you're just so blind that you can't see the problem. Practicing your religion should not include pushing it on other people, or making them pay for your fantasy....I'm talking about the recent plague of laws being enacted.
Specifics please and also try to explain how they favor only Christians.
(August 30, 2017 at 10:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: ...But then again, this is the same person who claims it is scientific fact that a human fetus is a parasite.
(August 30, 2017 at 11:19 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: And all it takes is to look up the definition of parasite to show I'm right.
WebMD seems to consider it a baby right from the start. Fetal Development Slide Show Apparently you know something the experts don't. (doubt it, though)
Neo, I wouldn't bother with him. Ignorant fucking idiot.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 2:36 pm
(August 29, 2017 at 4:41 pm)alpha male Wrote: (August 29, 2017 at 4:30 pm)Cyberman Wrote: And why should I care what someone wrote in a dusty old book, especially when they can't even spell words like 'sulphur'?
You guys shouldn't care...and yet you apparently do.
That's because assholes like you keep showing up sprinkling jesus dust on our carpets. It's always the same shit, too. You never have anything new.
Posts: 6851
Threads: 76
Joined: October 17, 2012
Reputation:
31
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 3:19 pm
(August 30, 2017 at 2:36 pm)Minimalist Wrote: That's because assholes like you keep showing up sprinkling jesus dust on our carpets.
Except...an atheist started this thread.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 5:31 pm
Shock, horror.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 5:34 pm
(August 30, 2017 at 5:31 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Shock, horror.
In the religion sub-forum no less!
Can't you admins and mods do something about this outrage?!?
Posts: 6851
Threads: 76
Joined: October 17, 2012
Reputation:
31
RE: God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability
August 30, 2017 at 5:39 pm
They could stop claiming that they don't care about the Bible...
|