Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 27, 2022, 3:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"The Prime Directive"
#31
RE: "The Prime Directive"
I was going to make a witty remark about no longer being allowed to interfere with more primitive species, but then I realised that few species were more primitive than me.
As a species, we are fucked. To the next generation, I offer my inadequate apologies.
Reply
#32
RE: "The Prime Directive"
Guess I should stay in 'Off-Topic' then Tongue
Reply
#33
RE: "The Prime Directive"
(October 24, 2017 at 9:54 am)Shell B Wrote:
(October 24, 2017 at 6:22 am)Cyberman Wrote: We get accused of that all the time. We also get praised for our equitability. Comes with the job. Other than having to set the record straight, it's water and duck's backs.

Everybody knows I'm the favorite. It comes up in every thread where I dare disagree, so it must be true.

Anyway, Tibs, you sort out that not talking about pedophilia question or should I start a thread about pedophilia and see what happens?

The pope will object strenuously.

[Image: aHR0cHM6Ly9ydWhyc3BvcmEuZGUvdXBsb2Fkcy9p...MuanBn.jpg]
Reply
#34
RE: "The Prime Directive"
(October 24, 2017 at 9:54 am)Shell B Wrote:
(October 24, 2017 at 6:22 am)Cyberman Wrote: We get accused of that all the time. We also get praised for our equitability. Comes with the job. Other than having to set the record straight, it's water and duck's backs.

Everybody knows I'm the favorite. It comes up in every thread where I dare disagree, so it must be true.

Anyway, Tibs, you sort out that not talking about pedophilia question or should I start a thread about pedophilia and see what happens?

The rule has been updated and now reads:

Quote:While discussion of pedophilia / child pornography in relation to news-worthy stories is allowed, general discussion of the subjects and accusations of pedophilia is not.

We don't want to avoid discussion of pedophilia / child porn when it is news worthy. We do however want to avoid threads discussing it in general, the legality of it, or accusing people of it.
Reply
#35
RE: "The Prime Directive"
I believe a line should be easy to be drawed. Its one thing to discuss scandals on church, political parties associations. Its another thing to accuse others or a group of people of a real crime they haven't commited.
Reply
#36
RE: "The Prime Directive"
(October 24, 2017 at 12:51 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(October 24, 2017 at 9:54 am)Shell B Wrote: Everybody knows I'm the favorite. It comes up in every thread where I dare disagree, so it must be true.

Anyway, Tibs, you sort out that not talking about pedophilia question or should I start a thread about pedophilia and see what happens?

The rule has been updated and now reads:

Quote:While discussion of pedophilia / child pornography in relation to news-worthy stories is allowed, general discussion of the subjects and accusations of pedophilia is not.

We don't want to avoid discussion of pedophilia / child porn when it is news worthy. We do however want to avoid threads discussing it in general, the legality of it, or accusing people of it.


Generally speaking, I'm less interested in kiddy porn when it is in the news than when it is used to defame a particular religion or member of said religion .. but I'll just keep that to myself.   Angel
Reply
#37
RE: "The Prime Directive"
*drawn
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#38
RE: "The Prime Directive"
Quote:Staff reserve the right to ban certain members from these threads if they are deemed to be flaming or trolling.


Sorry, this is a little ambiguous...is flaming/trolling permitted or not?


Boru


NB: the above is directed at the inevitable disrupticons whose main function in these Fora are to flame and troll.
‘Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.’ Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply
#39
RE: "The Prime Directive"
I think singling out one controversial topic and banning its discussion is a little bit silly. Just my two cents worth.
[Image: Fenrir-sign.jpg]
Reply
#40
RE: "The Prime Directive"
(October 24, 2017 at 6:28 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: I think singling out one controversial topic and banning its discussion is a little bit silly.  Just my two cents worth.

Giant serpents are to titillating for discussion. You know what to do.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem




Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)