Brain Frying, IT, Stalkers

[WinterHold]

I think I said in my previous post:


Don't pick up cyber fights. It hurts your brain and the brain of others.

And, what is this word; "Jihad"?
It seems like a sandwich name. So it'll be like "I want double Jihad with extra cheese; tasty with spicy Osama with vegetables"..
Right?
It's a "type of beards" that blow up. Time bombs; and not farts; the shit blows up for real!

Jihad. Prounce it as "Jeeeehad".

Now seriously..

"Jihad" is an Arabic; in Arabic it's written like this:
جهاد
It's derive from the word "Johd"
جهد
Which means "Effort". So "Jihad" is a description for the "putting effort". So, you realize how ignorant you sound to me when you discuss matters with me from a rightist base.

What are the Christian crusaders? aren't they "contributors of effort in the path of Jesus"? i.e "Christian Jihadists"?
But you seem like an atheist Jihadist. Putting effort in the cause and all..Jihading me.

Atheism is not a religion, not a belief, it has no scriptures, it has no prophets, it has no authorities, it has none of those appurtenances of religion. Jihad is an exclusive islamic concept and a religious concept. Whatever it may be that you claim it might mean is irrelevant. You could claim it means unicorns and rainbows. That matters not. In atheism, it simply does not exist. Islam exclusively owns that term and has chosen to make it sinister. The issue remains between you and your fellow religionists. I don't have a religion, so how superstitious believers define "jihad" is irrelevant. It is not a concept atheists hold in any way.

Great; the "definition" debate again -_- *yawn.
Okay; just for your sake I will provide "other words" that redefine what I said above:

"Even humans, that 'take the position of irreligion/disbelief', can wage 'an effort' in the way of their cause".
I just said "Even humans, that take the atheist position, can Jihad in the way of their cause".

For all the different reasons inside the context of atheism; though.
Just like Muslim sectarian Jihadists who "put effort or jihad in the way of their cause"; let it be building a caliphate, or ruling with Sharia law, or executing resistance members...etc.

For atheists; the usual "flags of atheism" are nationality, racism, economy -communism/socialism-...etc.
The latest atheistic Jihad royal rumble was world war 2. The assholes even used nukes !

So linguistic rules are what define words; not people. Or else; language is obsolete.

---

Jihad is what you say when you want a ham sandwich in Riyadh.

About pigs; they eat shit.
In other words they are so filthy !

[WinterHold]

Exactly: entertainment and not horror. Pennywise is bold and that is quite not cool: to be afraid you need mystery; and mystery wasn't there. That's why I think Japanese ghosts -for example- are way, way way more scary.

---

I always see this clown-killer stuff in Hollywood movies; it's more like a theme: the psycho clown who butchers the kids in suburban towns.
Maybe it's more of a... fear of children phobia? fear of kids lead to fear of children stuff, and clowns are children stuff.

---

Why? just why can't you "live up to the claim of being normal", and post like a normal person, instead of a keyboard infedel jihadist?

---

No.
I said:


Arabs don't hate clowns. Arabs -like me- don't understand what is so funny about clowns.
That is called "different cultures".

China, Africa, Arabia, Europe. White, Brown, Black...etc.

Clowns, Kabab, Tea, Coffee...etc.

Americans say "ass"; Brits say "Arse"...etc.

---

Uhhhh, you literally called them stupid and retarded. Those are the word that you use when you hate something. Not sure what you think you are correcting me on....

You have a different set of meanings.
For example, "Stupid, retarded...etc" is not a sign of "hate"; It's a sign for dislike or apathy or both.

So I can dislike somebody. But it doesn't mean that I hate them. To be more precise, dislike the act itself; not the person.
Hate is not dislike.

[CapnAwesome]

Uhhhh, you literally called them stupid and retarded. Those are the word that you use when you hate something. Not sure what you think you are correcting me on....

You have a different set of meanings.
For example, "Stupid, retarded...etc" is not a sign of "hate"; It's a sign for dislike or apathy or both.

So I can dislike somebody. But it doesn't mean that I hate them. To be more precise, dislike the act itself; not the person.
Hate is not dislike.

Lol, okay pal. So the new stereotype is that Arabs dislike the act of clowning?? What a nitpickity fuck. That's the same thing as Arabs hate clowns. You are just disagreeing because it sounds funny. But you basically agree with me but just not the language.

[WinterHold]

You have a different set of meanings.
For example, "Stupid, retarded...etc" is not a sign of "hate"; It's a sign for dislike or apathy or both.

So I can dislike somebody. But it doesn't mean that I hate them. To be more precise, dislike the act itself; not the person.
Hate is not dislike.

Lol, okay pal. So the new stereotype is that Arabs dislike the act of clowning?? What a nitpickity fuck. That's the same thing as Arabs hate clowns. You are just disagreeing because it sounds funny. But you basically agree with me but just not the language.

I am very sorry, but what I said has nothing to do with what you're saying.

[CapnAwesome]

Lol, okay pal. So the new stereotype is that Arabs dislike the act of clowning?? What a nitpickity fuck. That's the same thing as Arabs hate clowns. You are just disagreeing because it sounds funny. But you basically agree with me but just not the language.

I am very sorry, but what I said has nothing to do with what you're saying.

You mean that you dislike clowns rather than hate them had nothing to do with one another? Lol, okay pal. You basically agreed with me, that Arabs hate clowns but just don't liken the phrasing. Am I not correct?

So you have apathy towards clowns but not full blown hate. A stupid distinction to cry over when we are talking about clowns.

[vorlon13]

[WinterHold]

I am very sorry, but what I said has nothing to do with what you're saying.

You mean that you dislike clowns rather than hate them had nothing to do with one another? Lol, okay pal. You basically agreed with me, that Arabs hate clowns but just don't liken the phrasing.  Am I not correct?

So you have apathy towards clowns but not full blown hate. A stupid distinction to cry over when we are talking about clowns.

I'm not PAL. I'm NTC.

Yes. Dislike is not hate. I may dislike fast-food because it's not healthy; but that doesn't mean I hate it.
No; that's not a stupid distinction; actually it matters a lot. Hating make wars. Disliking make alternatives.