Post and talk about your favorite (or not) PZ Meyers debate, lecture, or blog (Pharyngula)! I start with religion as tapeworm analogy:
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
PZ Meyers Thread
|
Post and talk about your favorite (or not) PZ Meyers debate, lecture, or blog (Pharyngula)! I start with religion as tapeworm analogy:
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
RE: PZ Meyers Thread
April 27, 2018 at 1:00 am
(This post was last modified: April 27, 2018 at 1:01 am by Succubus.)
The Courtier’s Reply
Was Meyers brilliant response to the claims of theologians that Richard Dawkins criticism of religious belief is invalid due to his lack of understanding of sophisticated theology. Satire at its best. Quote:I have considered the impudent accusations of Mr Dawkins with exasperation at his lack of serious scholarship. He has apparently not read the detailed discourses of Count Roderigo of Seville on the exquisite and exotic leathers of the Emperor’s boots, nor does he give a moment’s consideration to Bellini’s masterwork, On the Luminescence of the Emperor’s Feathered Hat. We have entire schools dedicated to writing learned treatises on the beauty of the Emperor’s raiment, and every major newspaper runs a section dedicated to imperial fashion; Dawkins cavalierly dismisses them all. He even laughs at the highly popular and most persuasive arguments of his fellow countryman, Lord D. T. Mawkscribbler, who famously pointed out that the Emperor would not wear common cotton, nor uncomfortable polyester, but must, I say must, wear undergarments of the finest silk. ..."how else to explain the apparent sloth of the staff at the palace laundry..." ![]() ![]() ![]()
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
PZ Myers puts creationist in his place, teaches biology, and drinks scotch with the Scottish:
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
I didn't even know he was still around?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|