DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

I am just provided proof of a Designer to atheists 

And your doing a poor job

and I am faced with mostly nonsense feedback. 

Nope your face with reasonable counters 

How is that arrogant.  

Creationism is arrogance i'm afraid

I am confident in what I believe because it is crystal clear but not arrogant about it.

I'm afraid you are

---

I didn't realize he made those statements.

Happy to have enlightened you on the matter ( and i legit mean that by the way )

[LadyForCamus]

[quote='LadyForCamus' pid='1754738' dateline='1526178120']

We aren’t making any arguments.  You are making a positive argument (a conscious, intelligent mind created life on earth) and we are pointing out the flaws in that argument. If your argument for ID is, “I can’t imagine how it could have  happened naturally,” then your whole argument is grounded in a logical fallacy.

It's not that I can't imagine how it happened naturally, it's that it couldn't have happened naturally.

Exactly the same thing, friend.

[Anomalocaris]

We aren’t making any arguments.  You are making a positive argument (a conscious, intelligent mind created life on earth) and we are pointing out the flaws in that argument. If your argument for ID is, “I can’t imagine how it could have  happened naturally,” then your whole argument is grounded in a logical fallacy.

It's not that I can't imagine how it happened naturally, it's that it couldn't have happened naturally.

---

You have no idea what science is.  You think science is nothing more than another artifact of theism’s oldest and most revered practice of making shit up with conviction and inventing words to make them sound weighty.   All you know is science seem to work and impress a lot of people, so you see nothing wrong misapplying the vocabulary of science to makeup shit from your religion.

I've studied more science than you think.  Do you realize how much science is involved in mechanical engineering studies and application?

Yes, I do.  

I majored in biology for a year and half, then double majored in physics and aeronautical engineering. I also have a masters in mechanical engineering.

In engineering, one primarily receives what relevant fields of science has found.  Really not much about the deeper underpinning of the scientific method and how science is actually done, especially not developments in the philosophy of science, especially not the process of discovery of things that is fundamental to understanding but not immediately susceptible to application by engineering is needed to pass all the tests, include the specifically science classes required in the typical curriculum.

If your exposure to science is having received relevemt laws and relations it has discovered in the course of engineering study, then it is perhaps not too surprising you could think what you received from your bible obsession and those of like obsession is much the same as science.

[Amarok]

As for the principle of eugenics by elimination of the disabled. That's an ancient practice that was written about by the Greeks as deformity or mental incapacity was highly undesirable . Hitler himself praised the ancient Spartans for their racialist and eugenic principles .

[CDF47]

We aren’t making any arguments.  You are making a positive argument (a conscious, intelligent mind created life on earth) and we are pointing out the flaws in that argument. If your argument for ID is, “I can’t imagine how it could have  happened naturally,” then your whole argument is grounded in a logical fallacy.

It's not that I can't imagine how it happened naturally, it's that it couldn't have happened naturally.

Exactly the same thing, friend.

No, it's impossible is my point.  It doesn't matter what I think.  It just is what it is.

[Amarok]

No, it's impossible is my point.  It doesn't matter what I think.  It just is what it is.

Pure opinion. Without fact .

[Anomalocaris]

No, it's impossible is my point.  It doesn't matter what I think.  It just is what it is.

Pure opinion. Without fact .

How, besides your opinion as informed by the religiously inspired garbage of “intelligent design”, do you know that is how reality is?

[CDF47]

It's not that I can't imagine how it happened naturally, it's that it couldn't have happened naturally.

---

I've studied more science than you think.  Do you realize how much science is involved in mechanical engineering studies and application?

Yes, I do.  

I majored in biology for a year and half, then double majored in physics and aeronautical engineering. I also have a masters in mechanical engineering.

In engineering, one primarily receives what relevant fields of science has found.  Really not much about the deeper underpinning of the scientific method and how science is actually done, especially not developments in the philosophy of science, especially not the process of discovery of things that is fundamental to understanding but not immediately susceptible to application by engineering is needed to pass all the tests, include the specifically science classes required in the typical curriculum.

If your exposure to science is having received laws and relations it has discovered in the course of engineering study, then it is perhaps not too surprising you could think what you received from your bible obsession and those of like obsession is much the same as science.

I can see why it is hard for you to turn to the truth than at this point, investing so much in a false belief such as atheism.

---

Pure opinion. Without fact .

How, besides your opinion as informed by the religiously inspired garbage of “intelligent design”, do you know that is how reality is?

ID is not religiously inspired.  It is science but it has religious implications.

[Anomalocaris]

Yes, I do.  

I majored in biology for a year and half, then double majored in physics and aeronautical engineering. I also have a masters in mechanical engineering.

In engineering, one primarily receives what relevant fields of science has found.  Really not much about the deeper underpinning of the scientific method and how science is actually done, especially not developments in the philosophy of science, especially not the process of discovery of things that is fundamental to understanding but not immediately susceptible to application by engineering is needed to pass all the tests, include the specifically science classes required in the typical curriculum.

If your exposure to science is having received laws and relations it has discovered in the course of engineering study, then it is perhaps not too surprising you could think what you received from your bible obsession and those of like obsession is much the same as science.

I can see why it is hard for you to turn to the truth than at this point, investing so much in a false belief such as atheism.

---

How, besides your opinion as informed by the religiously inspired garbage of “intelligent design”, do you know that is how reality is?

ID is not religiously inspired.  It is science but it has religious implications.

Right.   It is science. How do you know what science is?   Through having received some of what it has found much like your having received the words of “god”?

[Amarok]

ID is not religiously inspired.  It is science but it has religious implications.

ID pretends it's not religious but it is .