Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 22, 2020, 5:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Guidelines for Staff Correspondence
#1
New Guidelines for Staff Correspondence
Hello,

We wanted to make you all aware of a new change regarding PMing staff. Some of you may have already noticed this addition to official PMs from staff members:

"If you would like to discuss the contents of this message, please do not reply directly to this staff member. Please create a new thread in the "Questions for Staff" subforum so that the entire staff can assist you." 

When we reach a staff decision regarding a report, one of us usually volunteers to message the members involved, regardless of how we voted on the topic. Often, that staff member will get a reply from the involved parties. Unfortunately, that's problematic for us because we have to go back to the rest of the staff with any questions or complaints the member has and then go back to re-message that member. In order to get around that problem, the following guidelines are now in effect:

1. If you have any questions, concerns, comments, do not choose a member of staff and message them directly. Obviously, non-official correspondence with individual staff members is still perfectly fine. However, when you have a forum-related issue, we want you to use this forum: https://atheistforums.org/forum-80.html. The threads you create there are between you and staff. It allows us all to weigh in.

2. Whenever a staff member messages you about a report or other official forum issue, do not reply directly to that staff member. They are just the messenger. Instead, use the same forum to create a thread about any questions, comments or concerns you have about the message. https://atheistforums.org/forum-80.html Again, these threads are between you and staff only.

Thanks so much for understanding these new guidelines. We will try to leave reminders at the bottom of all staff messages and possibly add this to the rules for future, easier reference.

Later,

AF Staff
Reply
#2
RE: New Guidelines for Staff Correspondence
If you don't kudos the above post I'ma think you don't get it.

Reply
#3
RE: New Guidelines for Staff Correspondence
I don't get it.
Reply
#4
RE: New Guidelines for Staff Correspondence
Always has to be one wyzas.

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Information Staff Log - Bannings, Reports, and Other Actions Darwinian 2294 493074 Yesterday at 11:13 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The "Report" button, and how not to treat your staff. Jackalope 71 17683 February 9, 2020 at 1:50 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Get to know your staff [UPDATED] Losty 534 23302 February 16, 2018 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Losty
  Staff Interviews - Tiberius Tiberius 103 7606 November 19, 2016 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Staff Interviews - Losty (Plus our NEW YouTube channel!) Tiberius 72 8378 November 5, 2016 at 11:49 pm
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  Staff Interviews - Stimbo Tiberius 33 3092 October 13, 2016 at 8:57 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Staff Interviews - robvalue Tiberius 81 5828 October 6, 2016 at 2:45 am
Last Post: robvalue
  New subforum "Questions for Staff". Jackalope 47 6232 September 16, 2016 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Rule Change (New Staff Power) Tiberius 627 42292 April 9, 2016 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  New Rule: Posting Private Correspondence Tiberius 72 10336 March 31, 2016 at 7:39 pm
Last Post: Joods



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)