Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 10:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Banning face coverings
#11
RE: Banning face coverings
So, are we going to ban dressing up in Halloween costumes next? Fucking fashion fascists!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#12
RE: Banning face coverings
I might have to wear a moonsuit this winter with my current health issues . . . .

Huh
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#13
RE: Banning face coverings
May as well ban men with beards then if we're going to be equal Dunno

Rob, is your point one of security, fashion or as a religious expression?

I would ban it here simply from a practical security aspect. Same reason you can't walk into a bank with a bike helmet on ...
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#14
RE: Banning face coverings
Using the practical definition of what a choice is, not getting into a debate about free will, I think some women do choose to hide their face because of religious indoctrination.  Their beliefs influence their choice.  

I think it would be better to ban it in certain places and situations.  There's going to be an element of fear in upholding the ban in any situation in England.  It's in a place with some violent Muslim gangs, the ban is going to involve them, they'll basically need an army to enforce individual situations of a woman wearing a face veil from time to time.  So the situation they're going to enforce it in should be worth it because it'll cost a lot of police time.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#15
RE: Banning face coverings
(August 18, 2018 at 1:09 am)ignoramus Wrote: May as well ban men with beards then if we're going to be equal Dunno

Rob, is your point one of security, fashion or as a religious expression?

I would ban it here simply from a practical security aspect. Same reason you can't walk into a bank with a bike helmet on ...

I'm finding the whole thing confusing really. I'm thinking it all through. Right now it seems to me like a general ban is a bad idea, as the arguments supporting it are rather weak. The question is whether a ban would be a benefit to society overall. That's always an extremely difficult issue. I'm feeling that the restriction on personal liberty is not justified by potential benefits, and going after religious indoctrination in this manner is a dubious practice. Perhaps the countries that made the ban hoped that this would aid integration, but I wonder if this just makes things worse.

I agree that people should have to remove it when security demands it, like you say. If you need to be identifiable, then religious exemption is not acceptable.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#16
RE: Banning face coverings
(August 17, 2018 at 9:01 am)robvalue Wrote: A ban would make including this in indoctrination harder. This would, I hope, be a benefit to all women yet to be born into Islam. But the price would probably be heavy for all the women currently wearing them. My wife pointed out to me that even in England, there are some extreme Muslim subcommunities that the police are frightened to enter. Enforcing such a ban here would be very hard, and if it was done, it could result in women becoming prisoners in their home. They might not be let out in public at all.

These downsides really hit home with me. You can ban all the headwear you'd like, but (unfortunately) it is nigh impossible to ban the subjugation of women. And, in truth, that's what we'd like to ban.

I imagine most Americans would oppose such a measure (myself included), because the freedom to dress however we please is sacred to us.

So with those two things in mind, I would personally oppose such a ban.
Reply
#17
RE: Banning face coverings
Banning religiously-motivated face coverings accomplishes nothing, aside from feeding kneejerk religious persecution reactions and already overstrained racial tensions. More profitable would be to work on the root causes and make it so that women, in this case, don't feel forced to wear such things.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#18
RE: Banning face coverings
[Image: j6a4sa99mcuy.jpg]

[Image: 2015-03-13.jpg]
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#19
RE: Banning face coverings
(August 17, 2018 at 9:01 am)robvalue Wrote: My wife pointed out to me that even in England, there are some extreme Muslim subcommunities that the police are frightened to enter.

Where ?
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. — Edward Gibbon

Reply
#20
RE: Banning face coverings
(August 18, 2018 at 4:51 am)pgrimes15 Wrote:
(August 17, 2018 at 9:01 am)robvalue Wrote: My wife pointed out to me that even in England, there are some extreme Muslim subcommunities that the police are frightened to enter.

Where ?

If it's anywhere it'll be somewhere around London or Birmingham.

I live around one of the rougher Muslim areas outside of a big city.  The police aren't afraid to enter but if two Pakistani families are fighting it takes a few vans of police to split them up sometimes.

Even during the riots in the 90s the police weren't afraid to enter but they just came in vans with guns. Which is a pretty rare sight in England outside of a big city.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Banning religious teachings for minors Dystopia 15 2336 July 5, 2014 at 8:36 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Alleged Contradictions - Seeing God's Face Daystar 15 10328 November 9, 2008 at 10:24 am
Last Post: Kyuuketsuki



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)