Login

**thesummerqueen** · February 18, 2011 at 7:20 am

He just likes irking people, that's all.

KichigaiNeko · February 18, 2011 at 7:22 am

(February 18, 2011 at 7:20 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: He just likes irking people, that's all.

Ahhhh so he is "irksome"???

**thesummerqueen** · February 18, 2011 at 7:23 am

Irksome Ibby

Skipper · February 18, 2011 at 7:25 am

Support it for the obvious reason that it's between two consenting adults who should be able to marry eachother if they so wish. Why the fuck not?

**Tiberius** · February 18, 2011 at 8:34 am

I oppose it since I oppose the government getting involved with any aspect of religion. The government should stay out of all types of marriage (including heterosexual marriage); it has no business being there in the first place.

~~fr0d0~~ · February 18, 2011 at 8:44 am

Marriage isn't what it is, it should be legally recognised partnership or something. So I can't vote.

OnlyNatural · February 18, 2011 at 9:45 am

I completely support the right of people who love each other to get married, regardless of sexual orientation. If they choose a 'marriage' instead of just a 'civil partnership,' they should have access to it on equal grounds with heterosexual couples. I see absolutely no reason why they shouldn't.

Dotard · February 18, 2011 at 10:13 am

Well Hi everybody!

You all know damn well ol' Dotard was going to show up in here voting 'against' and joining IB in some sort of baseless diatribe against homofags.

Guess again. I find myself unable to vote. If the poll would have been "Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion?", if you are a pro-choicer "Pro-Abortionist" is a bit misleading. It is the CHOICE you are pro for, not the abortions themselves.

I thinks if a couple of homos wished to put on paper their 'union' or partnership then the state should be bound to reconize it as a basis for shared insurance, death benifits etc. etc. If this is possible, why do gays place so much importance on having it reconized as a traditional 'marriage'?

It is of my opinion the push for 'marriage' is an attempt to normalize an abnormality.

~~fr0d0~~ · February 18, 2011 at 1:00 pm

It's not 'normalising' an abnormality minority position but recognising it and dealing with it fairly.

reverendjeremiah · (This post was last modified: February 18, 2011 at 2:54 pm by reverendjeremiah.)

(February 18, 2011 at 6:44 am)Zen Badger Wrote: What two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home is their own damn business and no-one elses.

(February 18, 2011 at 6:43 am)Irksome Ibby Wrote: I oppose it, because there are better things to think about.

Seriously, WTF????

That is a crap argument.

I agree. I have heard some lame cop-outs before, but this has to be the worst I have heard so far

(February 18, 2011 at 8:34 am)Tiberius Wrote: I oppose it since I oppose the government getting involved with any aspect of religion. The government should stay out of all types of marriage (including heterosexual marriage); it has no business being there in the first place.

Adrian. The question was simple and had nothing to do with government. You voted "I oppose it", but in your post you argue that you support it.

(February 18, 2011 at 8:44 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Marriage isn't what it is, it should be legally recognised partnership or something. So I can't vote.

In this case, you would vote "I oppose it"

(February 18, 2011 at 10:13 am)Dotard Wrote: Well Hi everybody!

You all know damn well ol' Dotard was going to show up in here voting 'against' and joining IB in some sort of baseless diatribe against homofags.

Guess again. I find myself unable to vote. If the poll would have been "Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion?", if you are a pro-choicer "Pro-Abortionist" is a bit misleading. It is the CHOICE you are pro for, not the abortions themselves.

I thinks if a couple of homos wished to put on paper their 'union' or partnership then the state should be bound to reconize it as a basis for shared insurance, death benifits etc. etc. If this is possible, why do gays place so much importance on having it reconized as a traditional 'marriage'?

It is of my opinion the push for 'marriage' is an attempt to normalize an abnormality.

Then on this poll you would vote "I oppose it"

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Poll: Gay Marriage - are you for or against it and why? This poll is closed.
I support it	89.53%	77	89.53%
I oppose it	10.47%	9	10.47%
Total		86 vote(s)	100%

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Why don't Southern states outlaw interracial marriage?	Jehanne	12	1464	July 26, 2022 at 7:55 am Last Post: h4ym4n
	1 dollar stands firmly against 1 hryvnia. Why?	Interaktive	6	539	June 23, 2021 at 5:00 am Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	Transgenderism versus Interracial Marriage.	Jehanne	3	716	April 18, 2021 at 1:09 pm Last Post: Rev. Rye
	Russia's Putin wants traditional marriage and God in constitution	zebo-the-fat	17	2106	March 4, 2020 at 7:44 pm Last Post: Fake Messiah
	Elizabeth Warren On Marriage Equality	BrianSoddingBoru4	8	1775	October 15, 2019 at 11:47 am Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
	Conservative and Gay	John V	42	6309	January 27, 2018 at 10:02 pm Last Post: Amarok
	Why oh why are people on the righ so against LGBT folk?	NuclearEnergy	10	2235	July 26, 2017 at 11:36 pm Last Post: Amarok
	Why is the Democratic Party against the only person who could save them?	Mystical	63	17891	June 3, 2017 at 9:25 pm Last Post: dyresand
	This Is What You're Up Against With Drumpfucks	Minimalist	20	3072	March 18, 2017 at 5:45 pm Last Post: Tiberius
	Do you know why wars happens and why middle east is robbed?	Safirno	12	2445	July 9, 2016 at 11:48 am Last Post: account_inactive