Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 5:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Devolution
#21
RE: Devolution
Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?
Reply
#22
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 2:10 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?

For a purpose, obviously (by the way, I assemble molecules all the time. It’s dead easy). But that’s not the point. Left to themselves, molecules will join with other molecules to form compounds. This is done without and direction or specific result in mind.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#23
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 2:10 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?

This question smuggles in so many assumptions.

Of what import is our idea of how we would arrange the world?

What color would you paint your unicorn?
Reply
#24
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 2:05 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Strawman. Where did "science" say that?

Tinman- it's a common fact, as referred to in: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/edi...33125.html

Its one article, not "science". Also do you even read the posts you link? Most probably not, just like any other troll. Ill read the fucking title of the link you posted:
Quote:The human brain is the most complex structure in the universe.
So, an article says the human brain is the most complex structure in the universe

#1 Really? Is that the case? Evidence....ya know*
#2 So what?


*hint: IC1101 the largest known galaxy has as many stars as the human brain has neurons. So much for #1
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#25
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 2:16 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(April 26, 2020 at 2:10 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?

For a purpose, obviously (by the way, I assemble molecules all the time. It’s dead easy). But that’s not the point. Left to themselves, molecules will join with other molecules to form compounds. This is done without and direction or specific result in mind.

Boru

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Are you deliberately avoiding biology, which shows how different kinds of cells are arranged and directed by the brain to work together for specific functions?
Most Believe ONLY what they WANT to Believe... Bubble Gum
Reply
#26
RE: Devolution
I assume Madman is here because of stay-at-home orders and this is his virtual version of annoying door knocking.
  
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
                                      
Reply
#27
RE: Devolution
This script has been done numerous times Jesus Wanker. Your ASSertion in the "direction" of life is nothing more than the product of a painfully defective understanding of all things simple and complex.
Reply
#28
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 12:55 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Are most of you aware that science refers to our Brain as "the Most Complex Mechanism in the Universe"?

I'm aware that science says no such thing.

This claim would imply that you've examined all other existing structures in the universe and have a meaningful way of measuring complexity.

I know that you haven't done the former and would bet good money that you can't do the latter.
Reply
#29
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 2:10 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?

Every atom in the universe is the result of combination of other atoms. Totally random outside of a lab.
Reply
#30
RE: Devolution
(April 26, 2020 at 3:25 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(April 26, 2020 at 2:10 pm)theMadJW Wrote: Let's say that SOMEHOW and of you here could assemble molecules to make things.
(Talk about ASSumption!)
Would you arrange them in meaningless order, or arrange them in such a way to actually make something for a purpose?

Every atom in the universe is the result of combination of other atoms. Totally random outside of a lab.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, since there was no Design involved, we exist because of uncountable random accidents all taking place at the same time- and in the right sequence!

heh
Most Believe ONLY what they WANT to Believe... Bubble Gum
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)