forbidding people to love each other

[The Grand Nudger]

Correct, a things naturalness ir unnatural ness is not equivalent to its rightness or wrongness.

That’s -why- mistakenly claiming that any part of any sexuality is unnatural is a useless argument that wastes everyone’s time. Yours included, since that line of argumentation doesn’t persuade you, either.

[no one]

kpop:
What a stunning fact... no one. I didn't know animals were your role models of sexuality.

Even if it is.. Things like criminal behavior and psychopathy are influenced by genes too. That doesn't make criminality right

[R00tKiT]

a things naturalness ir unnatural ness is not equivalent to its rightness or wrongness.

I agree. but it seems that, if something is unnatural it's more likely to be wrong. If natural means serving our natural needs of survival/procreation. Then anything unnatural like males copulating with males instead of females is clearly a faulty allocation of resources. A male would rather share his genetic makeup with a female to serve the purpose of procreation.

But I admit it's hard to make a case against homosexuality without referring to some religious repertoire...

[no one]

It seems your ability to comprehend anything kpop, diminishes with each letter you utter. Is your IQ like -4678909876545676645679123536273?

You make trumpanzees seem intelligent.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

While it appears to be true that there is no single ‘gay gene’ there’s a very real probability that sexual orientation may be determined by a complex of genes.

Boru

Even if it is.. Things like criminal behavior and psychopathy are influenced by genes too. That doesn't make criminality right.

The difference between psychopathy/criminal behaviour (as to right or wrong) should be glaringly obvious, even to you.

Boru

[R00tKiT]

It seems your ability to comprehend anything kpop, diminishes with each letter you utter. Is your IQ like -4678909876545676645679123536273?

You make trumpanzees seem intelligent.

You don't want to try me, no one. You might get your own IQ revealed to you in the process.

I think, instead, that you need to be banned, you cheaply insulted my mom. You and the pathetic Helios who Kudos the insult, you both don't deserve to be on the internet debating sexuality and morality. If you don't get banned, expect me to destroy you really bad next time you try to spam my posts.

[The Grand Nudger]

a things naturalness ir unnatural ness is not equivalent to its rightness or wrongness.

I agree. but it seems that, if something is unnatural it's more likely to be wrong. If natural means serving our natural needs of survival/procreation. Then anything unnatural like males copulating with males instead of females is clearly a faulty allocation of resources. A male would rather share his genetic makeup with a female to serve the purpose of procreation.

That’s not why I have sex, but again, I’m definitely gonna whisper that in my wife’s ear one night in bed.

At any rate, why does it matter how it seems when we’ve both agreed that we know it is not logically so?

But I admit it's hard to make a case against homosexuality without referring to some religious repertoire...

It really isn’t. It’s incredibly simple to make a case against anything from virtually any angle- but as your last attempt reasserted here even though you understand it’s false shows... it’s a bit more difficult to make a good o e.

I doubt that your silly god is the missing ingredient. You could always try, but my expectation is that it will be an even worse argument than the last.

[The Architect Of Fate]

His argument starts. with the assumption homosexuality is unnatural. This has already been shown false. This also makes the assumption that homosexuality does not contribute indirectly to copulation or is more about socialization than sex. Again this is not justified and is in fact challenged by science.

[arewethereyet]

It seems your ability to comprehend anything kpop, diminishes with each letter you utter. Is your IQ like -4678909876545676645679123536273?

You make trumpanzees seem intelligent.

You don't want to try me, no one. You might get your own IQ revealed to you in the process.

I think, instead, that you need to be banned, you cheaply insulted my mom. You and the pathetic Helios who Kudos the insult, you both don't deserve to be on the internet debating sexuality and morality. If you don't get banned, expect me to destroy you really bad next time you try to spam my posts.

Are you making threats?

Threats are against the rules.

Yo momma jokes, aren't.

[no one]

Hey, kpop go eat some pork, you stupid asshat.


You also used the word think, that's hilarious.

You are an insult to humanity, you and your worthless, pathetic, god, and your pedophile mooHAMed!