Posts: 3
Threads: 2
Joined: September 2, 2021
Reputation:
0
The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 2, 2021 at 10:29 pm
This is something I've been thinking for a few years.
I don't get the common narrative of the Norman Conquest, since there are holes in it.
The Bayeux Tapestry (which is actually an embroidery) was commissioned by the Normans. Like it's gonna be objective, right?
William said that King St. Edward the Confessor promised him the throne. I say bullshit. It wasn't his to promise, because the throne passed to the next eligible male relative of the king in the Anglo-Saxon system.
And the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles contradict the Tapestry. So which is right or wrong?
just a concocted narrative really.
Posts: 2773
Threads: 5
Joined: September 21, 2018
Reputation:
33
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 2:25 am
(September 2, 2021 at 10:29 pm)theablekingathelstan Wrote: This is something I've been thinking for a few years.
I don't get the common narrative of the Norman Conquest, since there are holes in it.
The Bayeux Tapestry (which is actually an embroidery) was commissioned by the Normans. Like it's gonna be objective, right?
William said that King St. Edward the Confessor promised him the throne. I say bullshit. It wasn't his to promise, because the throne passed to the next eligible male relative of the king in the Anglo-Saxon system.
And the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles contradict the Tapestry. So which is right or wrong?
just a concocted narrative really.
Unfortunately the facts contradict to "what you´ve been thinking for a few years".
The Bayeux Tapestry is not the only evidence for the norman conquest of britain.
That being said, i give you a 2/10. Time to go back under your bridge?
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Posts: 1465
Threads: 31
Joined: November 29, 2020
Reputation:
8
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 7:46 am
Um...take this up with historians, maybe? Do a decade of exhaustive research and write a book, maybe? Change world history by posting rant on Atheist forum...not likely.
Why is it so?
~Julius Sumner Miller
Posts: 28405
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 8:00 am
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 1465
Threads: 31
Joined: November 29, 2020
Reputation:
8
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 8:12 am
Go away, you smell of elderberries.
Why is it so?
~Julius Sumner Miller
Posts: 28405
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 8:25 am
(September 3, 2021 at 8:12 am)Spongebob Wrote: Go away, you smell of elderberries.
fetchez la vache
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 6112
Threads: 53
Joined: September 25, 2018
Reputation:
20
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 8:27 am
This feels like a Bates thread.
Posts: 10723
Threads: 15
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
119
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 9:38 am
Um, welcome? Hope you make an introduction thread.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Posts: 46351
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 10:59 am
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2021 at 11:07 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(September 2, 2021 at 10:29 pm)theablekingathelstan Wrote: This is something I've been thinking for a few years.
I don't get the common narrative of the Norman Conquest, since there are holes in it.
The Bayeux Tapestry (which is actually an embroidery) was commissioned by the Normans. Like it's gonna be objective, right?
William said that King St. Edward the Confessor promised him the throne. I say bullshit. It wasn't his to promise, because the throne passed to the next eligible male relative of the king in the Anglo-Saxon system.
And the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles contradict the Tapestry. So which is right or wrong?
just a concocted narrative really.
What specific conflicts between the depictions on the Tapestry and the story in the Chronicle are giving you trouble?
Incidentally, while royal Anglo-Saxon succession generally was by primogeniture, there are instances of the Witenagemot both electing and deposing kings (although both systems necessarily take a backseat to an angry Frenchman with a sizable army).
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
![[Image: normans.jpg?w=845&h=468&crop=1]](https://jryantheaed.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/normans.jpg?w=845&h=468&crop=1)
