Why did Communists promote Evolution?

[Pat Mustard]

He wants attention.  As long as he is getting attention, he is going to keep this crap up.

Ya'll do what you have to do but it's not going to change his dog and pony show one little bit.

Hey, if he want's to hang around here and be skinned alive on an hourly basis, that's his kink. Who are we to deny the bullshitter his many and frequent intellectual destructions?

If this were a site where there were any people liable to fall for his bullshit, I'd leave the rag doll alone, but the fact is he's got nobody here to preach to and he'll eventually realise that and slink away like the broken cur that he is.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Humans are Apes, lol. Pathetic. You may be a Son of a Monkey, according to your Apist Theory, but I certainly am not. I am a son of God through Jesus Christ the Lord, the Son of God.

Boru

[Pat Mustard]

Yeah, in Investment Banking no one could care in the least whether you believe

Yeah lad you're a banker in the same manner that I'm Taylor Swift. You're an unemployable 30 year old who hasn't left his mother's basement in the last fifteen years, since you left school because writing your name on an exam paper turned out to be beyond your capabilities.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Yeah, in Investment Banking no one could care in the least whether you believe

Cool story bro 

[Bucky Ball]

[quote pid='2158353' dateline='1690407892']

Humans are Apes, lol. Pathetic. You may be a Son of a Monkey, according to your Apist Theory, but I certainly am not. I am a son of God through Jesus Christ the Lord, the Son of God.

You actually have no choice. 
Genetics has proven the common ancestry. 
But thanks for proving yet again, you have no clue about this subject also.
No one says they are a son of a monkey. 
You can omit the religious shit. 
No one here cares.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I'm reminded of the (possibly apocryphal) exchange between Bishop Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley at the Oxford debate. The story goes, more or less, that Wilberforce asked Huxley if it was through his grandfather or his grandmother that he claimed descent from an ape. Huxley is said to have retorted that he would not be ashamed to have a monkey for an ancestor but would be ashamed to be connected to a man who would use his great gifts to obscure the truth. Basically, he preferred being related to a baboon than to a bishop.

Boru

[Thumpalumpacus]

Scientists were the ones who exposed Piltdown in the first place, which points up the strength of science: it's self-correcting.

[Angrboda]

3. Finally, from a Christian perspective, there is a special reason to be cautious and skeptical at least about Ape-Human Evolution or AHE, because those who hate Christianity use it as a polemical weapon to attack the Faith. In a 1930 Book by William A Williams where he successfully exposed the "Piltdown Man Hoax" that was commonly accepted at the time, but universally acknowledged to be a Hoax only after 1953 (see next point), the author wrote: "Other evolutionists openly announce their antagonism to the Bible and Christianity. Clarence Darrow, in the Tenn. trial, called Christianity a “fool religion." ... We were not surprised to learn that, in the Tenn. trial, evolution was defended by agnostics, who made their chief attack on the Bible and revealed religion; and the school, the home and religion were defended by men of high Christian character. Had Mr. Darrow as earnestly defended Christianity and Mr. Bryan as earnestly opposed it, millions would have held up their hands in astonishment. But the alignment was natural, and opened the eyes of multitudes to the fact that evolution is a friend to infidelity and a foe to Christianity. Their objection to prayer during the sessions of the Court shows that they hated what God loves." From: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/850...mages.html

In Rev. Williams book he notes that many "evolutionists" also reject Piltdown.  So what is the significance here?  Williams presents no evidence that it was a fake.  Claiming he "exposed" it as a fake is a stretch.  Williams screed is nothing but fallacious argument after fallacious argument.  As far as I can tell he presents no valid argument that Piltdown was a hoax.

Since it's your evidence, please present us with the evidence that Williams was using to draw his conclusion?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

We could move certain posts to a "COMPOST FORUM" that can't be edited or replied to. Just sayin'.

[Nishant Xavier]

1. Descendants of the ape, lol. Reminds me of what Piers Compton documented in the Broken Cross, which I'll cite in a minute. Btw, if any of us are actual descendants of the ape (we aren't), then, logically, it would follow, some of our descendants could be apes as well. This is what Evolutionists in Evo-Devo call "Devolution". Wiki: "Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that species can revert to supposedly more primitive forms over time." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)

And if anyone actually thinks human beings will give birth to apes again one day, he/she is kidding himself/herself. Yet this is what evolution/devolution would lead to. All these fallacies/sophisms come from failing to distinguish Accidental and Essential/Substantial Changes. The difference between Apes and Human Beings is an Essential/Substantial difference. It is never going to be traversed just by throwing in even billions of years if you want. Now, the difference between different kinds of humans - different genetic properties of those who are and remain biologically and genetically human beings - is an accidental difference. Only these kinds of differences will take place through natural selection. Humanity did not evolve from apes, which is to say apes did not give birth to humans. Neither will humans ever devolve to apes; those are all similar evolutionist errors.

2. Some of the Elites who promote this theory themselves know it is false. They don't believe it themselves, but they want you to. Here is an excerpt from Piers Comption's book: "‘We have brought many of them to boast of being atheists, and more than that, to glory in being descendants of the ape! We have given them new theories, impossible of realisation, such as Communism, anarchism, and Socialism, which are now serving our purposes. They have accepted them with the greatest enthusiasm, without realising that those theories are ours, and that they constitute the most powerful instrumentagainst themselves." From: https://archive.org/stream/TheBrokenCros...s_djvu.txt

Now, here is a Scientific Refutation of the alleged idea that apes and humans are supposedly so similar that crossing the boundaries between them is nothing other than a matter of time: "humans have several hundred protein-coding genes (all tightly integrated into the spliceosome) that are absent in chimps, the “similar” genes are scattered about in different places in the genome, and there are also entire gene families that are found in humans that are not in chimps. In the segments of the genome that are similar enough to make a comparison, the percentage of actual similarity between human and chimp DNA is probably closer to 80% – and when we compare the human and chimp Y chromosomes, the figure is even lower. These drastic differences between human and chimp DNA cannot be accounted for by evolutionary mathematics, so the statement that humans and chimps are 98% identical is nothing more than evolutionary dogma." https://creation.com/genetics-huge-probl...-evolution

What the Devil wants you to believe is that not God, but he, who's often called the Ape of God, and has appeared to some Saints like Saint Padre Pio in the form of an Ape, is your father. Evolutionists are happily doing his work, lol. The Bible shows us God is our Father and made us in His Image. 

3. Angrboda, as I mentioned and documented, some 250 publications for over 40 years used Piltdown Man to try argue against the Special Creation of the First Human Couple. They irrevocably destroyed the Faith of millions, for which they will have to give account to Almighty God. They falsely tried to use this as evidence in their Anti-Christian Scopes trial; they claimed it as the missing link for a long. And it was a Hoax! Then they quietly buried it as though nothing was out of the ordinary. This is like a Sherlock Holmes Murder Mystery. The people behind it are trying to kill not your bodies, but your souls. It's up to you to be wise enough to figure that out in time to go to Heaven. The evidence is clear.

Now, let me re-quote the salient excerpt from Williams around 1930: "While Wells says the bones of 100,000 horses were found in a single locality, Dr. Ales Hrdlicka says that the bones of 200,000 prehistoric horses were found in another place. Why should we not find, for the same reason, the bones of millions of ape-men and ape-women in 750,000 years? Instead of millions we have the alleged fragments of 4, all of which are of a very doubtful character."

In other words, Williams argues that the number of the alleged fragments of Piltdown man are so small - 4 instead of millions - that there's very good reason to believe there were not actual alleged ape-men over millions of years, and Piltdown man was a Total Hoax, as it was proven to be.

And similarly, the 2019 BBC article I quoted says: "The current view that an ape named Lucy was among a species that gave rise to the first early humans may have to be reconsidered." https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49486980 Yes, it needs to be re-considered all right, because this Ape "Lucy" of yours never gave birth to any human beings. Who is to say some 25 years from now, we will not be ultimately proven right, as Williams was? There are no ape-men or intermediates between apes and men who lived for alleged 100s of millions of years, otherwise the fossil record would look very different from what it is. There are apes and there are men, no ape-men.

The BBC article frankly admits: "'All bets now off' on which ape was humanity's ancestor". Lol, keep at it, guys, keep at it, you might get there, in 25 years, like people did with the Piltdown Man Hoax finally in 1953. No Ape was humanity's ancestor, but Humanity comes from a Loving God.


Evolution has made monkeys out of men.

Regards,
Nishant.