Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 1:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Banning circumsicion
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 23, 2023 at 1:38 pm)Varium Wrote: I think that it should be legal for parents to have their children circumcised because of how little advantages there are with foreskin, and how many negative things you can avoid being circumcised. I would rather have no foreskin and be healthy than have foreskin and a urinary tract infection. Do circumcisions prevent this? No, but they do reduce the risk.

If you practice routine sanitation you don't get infections of the prepuce. I have never had such. But hey, I'm only 72.

Your position is based on one sample. Very weak.
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
Somebody mentioned procedures that would continue even if they were banned.

Circumsicion as practiced in the us is an outlier there. There’s no ban, but the practice has been dropping off in the population faster than babies are being born since no one recommends it and it’s no longer taken as a given.

It’s not as pernicious. One wonders what it would take to cause a similar fall in fgm.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 23, 2023 at 11:38 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It’s not as pernicious.   One wonders what it would take to cause a similar fall in fgm.

Something approaching gender equality on a global scale?
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 23, 2023 at 5:29 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: If you practice routine sanitation you don't get infections of the prepuce. I have never had such. But hey, I'm only 72.  

Your position is based on one sample. Very weak.

Logical fallacy - Anecdotal evidence

"Your position is based on one sample." It's based on multiple actually, I only mentioned one though.
According to medlineplus.gov, a U.S government sanctioned website, 
"What are the medical benefits of circumcision?
The possible medical benefits of circumcision include:
  • A lower risk of HIV
  • A slightly lower risk of other sexually transmitted diseases[url=https://medlineplus.gov/sexuallytransmitteddiseases.html][/url]
  • A slightly lower risk of urinary tract infections and penile cancer. However, these are both rare in all males.
What are the risks of circumcision?
The risks of circumcision include:
  • A low risk of bleeding or infection
  • Pain. AAP suggests that providers use pain medicines to reduce pain from circumcision."
There's a lot more benefits than risks to circumcision, I understand it started as an archaic and barbaric practice, but I see it as very beneficial for the most part.
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
Administrator Notice
Deleted duplicate post.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
I read somewhere that circumcision of male infants within Jewish communities was (and in some communities still is) performed by a Rabbi ... using his teeth. The source of my info was a book titled 'Jewish Marriage', written by a Jewish author, that I came across in a Jewish charity shop. The book also advised Jewish married couples who were having "problems in their marriage" to ask their doctor to prescribe an aphrodisiac.
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 24, 2023 at 1:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
Administrator Notice
Deleted duplicate post.

Boru

That's my fault, the OG post wasn't showing up for whatever reason lol
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
No matter how it's done, I find it objectionable.

Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 24, 2023 at 1:07 pm)Varium Wrote:
(November 23, 2023 at 5:29 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: If you practice routine sanitation you don't get infections of the prepuce. I have never had such. But hey, I'm only 72.  

Your position is based on one sample. Very weak.

Logical fallacy - Anecdotal evidence

"Your position is based on one sample." It's based on multiple actually, I only mentioned one though.
According to medlineplus.gov, a U.S government sanctioned website, 
"What are the medical benefits of circumcision?
The possible medical benefits of circumcision include:
  • A lower risk of HIV
  • A slightly lower risk of other sexually transmitted diseases[url=https://medlineplus.gov/sexuallytransmitteddiseases.html][/url]
  • A slightly lower risk of urinary tract infections and penile cancer. However, these are both rare in all males.
What are the risks of circumcision?
The risks of circumcision include:
  • A low risk of bleeding or infection
  • Pain. AAP suggests that providers use pain medicines to reduce pain from circumcision."
There's a lot more benefits than risks to circumcision, I understand it started as an archaic and barbaric practice, but I see it as very beneficial for the most part.
You had only one "lower" but two "slightly lower" as "benefits". And ONE "low risk".

"There's a lot more benefits than risks to circumcision" which you didn't post. Ie. Bullshit.
Reply
RE: Banning circumsicion
(November 24, 2023 at 2:06 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: You had only one "lower" but two "slightly lower" as "benefits". And ONE "low risk".

"There's a lot more benefits than risks to circumcision" which you didn't post. Ie. Bullshit.

Even then there's barely any reason that you would be against the idea of circumcision, at most you can call it genital mutilation
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My Video about Donald Trump Banning Huawei FlatAssembler 7 1046 September 30, 2019 at 4:04 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  NFL owners admit Trump pressured them into banning player protests Silver 27 3735 May 24, 2018 at 5:33 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)